Modeling Denitrification: Can We Report What We Don't Know?

  • B. Grosz*
  • , A. Matson
  • , K. Butterbach-Bahl
  • , T. Clough
  • , E. A. Davidson
  • , R. Dechow
  • , S. DelGrosso
  • , E. Diamantopoulos
  • , P. Dörsch
  • , E. Haas
  • , H. He
  • , C. V. Henri
  • , D. Hui
  • , K. Kleineidam
  • , D. Kraus
  • , M. Kuhnert
  • , J. Léonard
  • , C. Müller
  • , S. O. Petersen
  • , D. Sihi
  • I. Vogeler, R. Well, J. Yeluripati, J. Zhang, C. Scheer
*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journal/Conference contribution in journal/Contribution to newspaperComment/debate/letter to the editorResearchpeer-review

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Biogeochemical models simulate soil nitrogen (N) turnover and are often used to assess N losses through denitrification. Though models simulate a complete N budget, often only a subset of N pools/fluxes (i.e., N2O, (Formula presented.), NH3, NOx) are published since the full budget cannot be validated with measured data. Field studies rarely include full N balances, especially N2 fluxes, which are difficult to quantify. Limiting publication of modeling results based on available field data represents a missed opportunity to improve the understanding of modeled processes. We propose that the modeler community support publication of all simulated N pools and processes in future studies.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere2023AV000990
JournalAGU Advances
Volume4
Issue6
Number of pages7
ISSN2576-604X
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2023

Keywords

  • biogeochemical models
  • denitrification
  • N-cycle
  • N
  • nitrogen budget

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Modeling Denitrification: Can We Report What We Don't Know?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this