Mind the gap – towards complete and transparent reporting of animal research

Research output: Contribution to journal/Conference contribution in journal/Contribution to newspaperJournal articleCommunication

Standard

Mind the gap – towards complete and transparent reporting of animal research. / Tillmann, Sandra.

In: Medical Writing, Vol. 26, No. 4, 2018, p. 24-27.

Research output: Contribution to journal/Conference contribution in journal/Contribution to newspaperJournal articleCommunication

Harvard

APA

CBE

MLA

Vancouver

Author

Bibtex

@article{32927f76f38c494080086c7b2b8c2b6c,
title = "Mind the gap – towards complete and transparent reporting of animal research",
abstract = "Several initiatives have been taken to standardise the reporting of animal studies in peer-reviewed scientific journals, such as the ARRIVE (Animal Research: Reporting of In Vivo Experiments) and GSPC (Gold Standard Publication Checklist) guidelines. Surprisingly, many publications still lack key methodological details. As a result, animal studies are often criticised for poor scientific quality and low translatability to the clinic. To promote adherence to available guidelines, this article covers the rationales for including key parameters that are often overlooked, such as strain nomenclature, housing conditions, and behavioural test settings.",
author = "Sandra Tillmann",
year = "2018",
language = "English",
volume = "26",
pages = "24--27",
journal = "Medical Writing",
issn = "2047-4806",
publisher = "Maney Publishing",
number = "4",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Mind the gap – towards complete and transparent reporting of animal research

AU - Tillmann, Sandra

PY - 2018

Y1 - 2018

N2 - Several initiatives have been taken to standardise the reporting of animal studies in peer-reviewed scientific journals, such as the ARRIVE (Animal Research: Reporting of In Vivo Experiments) and GSPC (Gold Standard Publication Checklist) guidelines. Surprisingly, many publications still lack key methodological details. As a result, animal studies are often criticised for poor scientific quality and low translatability to the clinic. To promote adherence to available guidelines, this article covers the rationales for including key parameters that are often overlooked, such as strain nomenclature, housing conditions, and behavioural test settings.

AB - Several initiatives have been taken to standardise the reporting of animal studies in peer-reviewed scientific journals, such as the ARRIVE (Animal Research: Reporting of In Vivo Experiments) and GSPC (Gold Standard Publication Checklist) guidelines. Surprisingly, many publications still lack key methodological details. As a result, animal studies are often criticised for poor scientific quality and low translatability to the clinic. To promote adherence to available guidelines, this article covers the rationales for including key parameters that are often overlooked, such as strain nomenclature, housing conditions, and behavioural test settings.

M3 - Journal article

VL - 26

SP - 24

EP - 27

JO - Medical Writing

JF - Medical Writing

SN - 2047-4806

IS - 4

ER -