TY - JOUR
T1 - Microvascular resistance reserve
T2 - Impact on health status and myocardial perfusion after revascularization in chronic coronary syndrome
AU - Rasmussen, Laust Dupont
AU - Westra, Jelmer
AU - Karim, Salma Raghad
AU - Dahl, Jonathan Nørtoft
AU - Søby, Jacob Hartmann
AU - Ejlersen, June Anita
AU - Gormsen, Lars Christian
AU - Eftekhari, Ashkan
AU - Christiansen, Evald Høj
AU - Bøttcher, Morten
AU - Winther, Simon
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 The Author(s). Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved.
PY - 2025/2/1
Y1 - 2025/2/1
N2 - Background and Aims: The microvascular resistance reserve (MRR) is a novel invasive index of the microcirculation, which is independent of epicardial stenoses, and has both diagnostic and prognostic implications. This study investigates whether MRR is associated with health status outcomes by revascularization in patients with moderate coronary stenoses. Methods: Consecutive patients with stable chest pain and moderate (30%-90% diameter) stenoses on invasive coronary angiography (n = 222) underwent invasive physiology assessment. Revascularization was performed according to guideline recommendations. At baseline and follow-up, health status and myocardial perfusion were assessed by the Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ) and positron emission tomography. The primary endpoint was freedom from angina at follow-up with secondary endpoints including changes in health status by SAQ domains and myocardial perfusion by MRR and revascularization status. Low MRR was defined as ≤3.0. Results: Freedom from angina occurred in 38/173 patients. In multivariate analyses, MRR was associated with freedom from angina at follow-up (odds ratio 0.860, 95% confidence interval 0.740-0.987). By MRR and revascularization groups, patients with normal MRR who did not undergo revascularization, and patients with abnormal MRR who underwent revascularization, had improved health status of angina frequency [mean difference SAQ angina frequency score 8.5 (3.07-13.11) and 13.5 (2.82-23.16), respectively]. For both groups, health status of physical limitation [mean difference in SAQ physical limitation score 9.7 (4.79-11.93) and 8.7 (0.53-13.88), respectively] and general health status [mean difference in SAQ summary score 9.3 (5.18-12.50) and 10.8 (2.51-17.28), respectively] also improved. Only patients with abnormal MRR who underwent revascularization had improved myocardial perfusion. Conclusions: In patients with moderate coronary stenoses, MRR seems to predict the symptomatic and perfusion benefit of revascularization.
AB - Background and Aims: The microvascular resistance reserve (MRR) is a novel invasive index of the microcirculation, which is independent of epicardial stenoses, and has both diagnostic and prognostic implications. This study investigates whether MRR is associated with health status outcomes by revascularization in patients with moderate coronary stenoses. Methods: Consecutive patients with stable chest pain and moderate (30%-90% diameter) stenoses on invasive coronary angiography (n = 222) underwent invasive physiology assessment. Revascularization was performed according to guideline recommendations. At baseline and follow-up, health status and myocardial perfusion were assessed by the Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ) and positron emission tomography. The primary endpoint was freedom from angina at follow-up with secondary endpoints including changes in health status by SAQ domains and myocardial perfusion by MRR and revascularization status. Low MRR was defined as ≤3.0. Results: Freedom from angina occurred in 38/173 patients. In multivariate analyses, MRR was associated with freedom from angina at follow-up (odds ratio 0.860, 95% confidence interval 0.740-0.987). By MRR and revascularization groups, patients with normal MRR who did not undergo revascularization, and patients with abnormal MRR who underwent revascularization, had improved health status of angina frequency [mean difference SAQ angina frequency score 8.5 (3.07-13.11) and 13.5 (2.82-23.16), respectively]. For both groups, health status of physical limitation [mean difference in SAQ physical limitation score 9.7 (4.79-11.93) and 8.7 (0.53-13.88), respectively] and general health status [mean difference in SAQ summary score 9.3 (5.18-12.50) and 10.8 (2.51-17.28), respectively] also improved. Only patients with abnormal MRR who underwent revascularization had improved myocardial perfusion. Conclusions: In patients with moderate coronary stenoses, MRR seems to predict the symptomatic and perfusion benefit of revascularization.
KW - Chronic coronary syndrome
KW - Health status
KW - Microvascular resistance reserve
KW - Revascularization
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85217032016&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1093/eurheartj/ehae604
DO - 10.1093/eurheartj/ehae604
M3 - Journal article
C2 - 39217607
SN - 0195-668X
VL - 46
SP - 424
EP - 435
JO - European Heart Journal
JF - European Heart Journal
IS - 5
ER -