Micro-level model explanation and counterfactual constraint

Samuel Schindler*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journal/Conference contribution in journal/Contribution to newspaperJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Relationships of counterfactual dependence have played a major role in recent debates of explanation and understanding in the philosophy of science. Usually, counterfactual dependencies have been viewed as the explanantia of explanation, i.e., the things providing explanation and understanding. Sometimes, however, counterfactual dependencies are themselves the targets of explanations in science. These kinds of explanations are the focus of this paper. I argue that “micro-level model explanations” explain the particular form of the empirical regularity underlying a counterfactual dependency by representing it as a physical necessity on the basis of postulated microscopic entities. By doing so, micro-level models rule out possible forms the regularity (and the associated counterfactual) could have taken. Micro-model explanations, in other words, constrain empirical regularities and their associated counterfactual dependencies. I introduce and illustrate micro-level model explanations in detail, contrast them to other accounts of explanation, and consider potential problems.

Original languageEnglish
Article number40
JournalEuropean Journal for Philosophy of Science
Volume12
Issue2
ISSN1879-4912
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2022

Keywords

  • Counterfactual dependence
  • Explanation
  • micro-model
  • Modality
  • Necessity

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Micro-level model explanation and counterfactual constraint'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this