Abstract
The argument is that a theory on the psychologic of religion must include at least the four dimensions of biology, the psyche, culture and society. The criticism raised against Jan Tønnesvang's article is that it only deals with the psyche. This is critically addressed, and the article ends by asking whether Tønnesvang's model can be applied globally and if so, how?
| Translated title of the contribution | Does it work globally?: Reflections on 'Elements in the psykological logic of religiosity' from the viewpoint of the comparative study of religion |
|---|---|
| Original language | Danish |
| Journal | Journal of anthropological psychology |
| Issue | 16 |
| Pages (from-to) | 89-94 |
| ISSN | 1397-0658 |
| Publication status | Published - 2005 |