Literature education in Nordic L1s: Cultural models of national lower-secondary curricula in Denmark, Finland, Norway and Sweden

Aslaug Gourvennec, Heidi Höglund, Maritha Johansson, Kristine Kabel, Margrethe Sønneland

Research output: Contribution to journal/Conference contribution in journal/Contribution to newspaperJournal articleResearchpeer-review

19 Citations (Scopus)
116 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

This study aims to shed light on the cultural models of literature and literature education reflected in Nordic L1 curricula by investigating how literature is given discursive significance in the Danish, Finnish, Norwegian and Swedish L1 curricula for lower-secondary school, both within and across those four countries. Education in the Nordic countries is a field well suited for comparative analysis as the languages used are closely related and the countries' educational systems and policies are similar. In the study, we discuss how literary texts are given significance compared with other texts and what purposes of literature education are given a prominent place in the L1 curricula. The theoretical framework used derives from Gee's (2014) description of cultural models; we understand the national curricula as linguistically created realms of reality. The comparative analysis suggests that there are similar tendencies as well as distinct national differences. Prominent cultural models identified across the countries are a double position of literary texts and a high expectation on literature education. The study points to a need to discuss the status and purpose of literary texts in the Nordic L1 subjects in order to promote further mutual understanding and inspiration across borders.

Original languageEnglish
JournalL1-Educational Studies in Language and Literature
Volume20
Issue20
Pages (from-to)1-32
Number of pages32
ISSN1578-6617
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2020

Keywords

  • Grundskole
  • Kultur
  • Sprog

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Literature education in Nordic L1s: Cultural models of national lower-secondary curricula in Denmark, Finland, Norway and Sweden'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this