Is science skepticism really about science?

Simon Fuglsang, Lucilla Losi*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journal/Conference contribution in journal/Contribution to newspaperJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Despite the recent rise in public and academic concern, science skepticism remains ill-defined. This paper sets out to further our understanding of science skepticism and to inform both academic research and policymaking. Departing from a review of the academic literature on conceptualizations of science skepticism, we employ Eurobarometer 2021 data to explore the characteristics of people holding skeptical attitudes concerning climate change and evolution. Replicating prior findings, we observe minor variations across sociodemographic characteristics. Moreover, science skepticism relates to general science attitudes in a nonuniform manner within and across issues, and interest in and engagement with science are nonuniformly related to skepticism. Furthermore, science skepticism is inconsistent in its relationship to both attitudes and relationships with science across contexts. Based on the heterogeneous nature of skepticism(s), we argue that research and policy should be careful in approaching science skepticism as a general negative predisposition toward science.

Original languageEnglish
JournalScience and Public Policy
Volume51
Issue6
Pages (from-to)1133-1142
Number of pages10
ISSN0302-3427
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Dec 2024

Keywords

  • antiscience
  • climate change
  • evolution
  • science skepticism

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Is science skepticism really about science?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this