Investigating the effects of perinatal status and gender on adults' responses to infant and adult facial emotion

Research output: Contribution to journal/Conference contribution in journal/Contribution to newspaperJournal articleResearchpeer-review

DOI

  • Christine E Parsons
  • Lauri Nummenmaa, Turku PET Centre
  • ,
  • Eija Sinerva, FinnBrain Birth Cohort Study, Turku Brain and Mind Center, Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Turku, Finland.
  • ,
  • Riika Korja, FinnBrain Birth Cohort Study, Turku Brain and Mind Center, Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Turku, Finland.
  • ,
  • Jani Kajanoja, FinnBrain Birth Cohort Study, Turku Brain and Mind Center, Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Turku, Finland.
  • ,
  • Katherine S Young, Social Genetic and Developmental Psychiatry Centre
  • ,
  • Hasse Karlsson, FinnBrain Birth Cohort Study, Turku Brain and Mind Center, Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Turku, Finland.
  • ,
  • Linnea Karlsson, FinnBrain Birth Cohort Study, Turku Brain and Mind Center, Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Turku, Finland.

The perception of emotion in infant faces is a key parental skill, thought to be impacted by caregiving experience. It is widely assumed that women, and in particular mothers in the postnatal period, are more attuned to infant facial expressions than men. However, empirical evidence for this is lacking, and it is not yet clear whether potential differences in emotion processing between adults during pregnancy and postnatally are specific to infant expressions or extend to faces of all ages. In this cross-sectional study using a subsample from a Finnish birth cohort (N = 610), we examine adult and infant facial expression perception in pre- and postnatal men and women. Women rated the happy infant faces more positively on the valence (pleasure) dimension than men, but men rated the faces higher on the arousal (excited) dimension. There were no significant differences between adults responding during pregnancy or postnatally, but first-time mothers rated the faces as higher in arousal overall than multiparous mothers. The ability to identify specific emotions (e.g., sadness) in adult faces correlated with judgments of emotion in similarly valenced infant faces. We conclude that adults differ in their sensitivity to positive or negative emotions, independent of whether they are expressed in infant or adult faces. We did not find that perinatal status (pre- or postnatal) was associated with differences in sensitivity to emotion in infant or adult faces. Men and women were differentially sensitive to the valence and arousal in infant faces, independent of the timing of their responses. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).

Original languageEnglish
JournalEmotion
Volume21
Issue2
Pages (from-to)337-349
Number of pages13
ISSN1528-3542
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2021

    Research areas

  • Face processing, Gender differences, Infant faces, Parental status, Parenting

See relations at Aarhus University Citationformats

ID: 172994640