Invasive aortic pulse pressure is not superior to cuff pulse pressure in cardiovascular risk prediction

Esben Laugesen*, Søren T Knudsen, Klavs W Hansen, Niklas B Rossen, Lisette Okkels Jensen, Michael S Hansen, Lone K Andersen, Kristian K Thomsen, Hanne Søndergaard, Morten Böttcher, Bent Raungaard, Kevin K W Olesen, Michael Mæng, Hans Erik Bøtker, Per L Poulsen

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journal/Conference contribution in journal/Contribution to newspaperJournal articleResearchpeer-review

13 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Aortic pulse pressure (PP) represents the hemodynamic cardiac and cerebral burden more directly than cuff PP. The objective of this study was to investigate whether invasively measured aortic PP confers additional prognostic value beyond cuff PP for cardiovascular events and death. With increasing age, cuff PP progressively underestimates aortic PP. Whether the prognostic association between cuff PP and outcomes is age-dependent remains to be elucidated.

METHODS: Cuff PP and invasively measured aortic PP were recorded in 21 908 patients (mean age 63 years, 58% men, 14% with diabetes) with stable angina pectoris undergoing elective coronary angiography during January 2001--December 2012. Multivariate Cox models were used to assess the association with incident myocardial infarction, stroke, and death. Discrimination was assessed using Harrell's C-index.

RESULTS: During a median follow-up period of 3.7 years (range 0.1-10.8 years), 422 strokes, 511 myocardial infarctions, and 1530 deaths occurred. Both cuff and aortic PP were associated with stroke, myocardial infarction, and death in crude analyses. However, only cuff PP remained associated with stroke (hazard ratio per 10 mmHg, 1.06 (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.01--1.12)] and myocardial infarction [hazard ratio per 10 mmHg 1.05 (95% CI 1.01--1.11)] in multivariate Cox models. Both cuff and aortic PP lost significance as predictors of death in multivariate models. Age did not modify the prognostic association between cuff PP and stroke, myocardial infarction, and death.

CONCLUSION: Invasively measured aortic PP did not add prognostic information about cardiovascular outcomes and death beyond cuff PP in patients with stable angina pectoris.

Original languageEnglish
JournalJournal of Hypertension
Volume39
Issue4
Pages (from-to)607-613
Number of pages7
ISSN0952-1178
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Apr 2021

Keywords

  • blood pressure measurement
  • cerebral infarction
  • diabetes mellitus
  • mortality
  • myocardial infarction
  • pulse pressure

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Invasive aortic pulse pressure is not superior to cuff pulse pressure in cardiovascular risk prediction'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this