Department of Political Science

Interpreting expectations: Normative and predictive expectations from the citizens’ viewpoint

Research output: Contribution to journal/Conference contribution in journal/Contribution to newspaperJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Standard

Interpreting expectations : Normative and predictive expectations from the citizens’ viewpoint. / Hjortskov, Morten.

In: Journal of Behavioral Public Administration, Vol. 3, No. 1, 01.2020, p. 1-11.

Research output: Contribution to journal/Conference contribution in journal/Contribution to newspaperJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Hjortskov, M 2020, 'Interpreting expectations: Normative and predictive expectations from the citizens’ viewpoint', Journal of Behavioral Public Administration, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 1-11. https://doi.org/10.30636/jbpa.31.72

APA

CBE

MLA

Vancouver

Author

Hjortskov, Morten. / Interpreting expectations : Normative and predictive expectations from the citizens’ viewpoint. In: Journal of Behavioral Public Administration. 2020 ; Vol. 3, No. 1. pp. 1-11.

Bibtex

@article{c8857d22c27f4ee4a62a944f276292c5,
title = "Interpreting expectations: Normative and predictive expectations from the citizens{\textquoteright} viewpoint",
abstract = "Citizens{\textquoteright} expectations are a primary source of information for politicians and public managers when developing public policies in democracies. Moreover, expectations are thought to have extensive influence on how citizens evaluate the resulting policy. If politicians want citizens who are satisfied with public services,they need to address these expectations. Theories of expectation formation tell us that two general forms of expectations exist: predictive and normative. Predictive expectations are about how a future service will be, whereas normative expectations concern how it should be. But do citizens make this distinction? If they perceiveand express their expectations differently than the theory predicts, it might affect the knowledge that we have on citizen expectations and their effects. This study investigates whether citizens have different interpretations of expectations and whether making them aware of the distinctions between predictive and normativeexpectations causes them to change their expectations. Results show that citizens interpret expectations very differently and that experimentally posing different questions about expectations at the same time merely increases the effect. The implications for the assessment of citizen expectations are discussed.",
keywords = "Citizen Expectations, Satisfaction, Experiment",
author = "Morten Hjortskov",
year = "2020",
month = jan,
doi = "10.30636/jbpa.31.72",
language = "English",
volume = "3",
pages = "1--11",
journal = "Journal of Behavioral Public Administration",
issn = "2576-6465",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Interpreting expectations

T2 - Normative and predictive expectations from the citizens’ viewpoint

AU - Hjortskov, Morten

PY - 2020/1

Y1 - 2020/1

N2 - Citizens’ expectations are a primary source of information for politicians and public managers when developing public policies in democracies. Moreover, expectations are thought to have extensive influence on how citizens evaluate the resulting policy. If politicians want citizens who are satisfied with public services,they need to address these expectations. Theories of expectation formation tell us that two general forms of expectations exist: predictive and normative. Predictive expectations are about how a future service will be, whereas normative expectations concern how it should be. But do citizens make this distinction? If they perceiveand express their expectations differently than the theory predicts, it might affect the knowledge that we have on citizen expectations and their effects. This study investigates whether citizens have different interpretations of expectations and whether making them aware of the distinctions between predictive and normativeexpectations causes them to change their expectations. Results show that citizens interpret expectations very differently and that experimentally posing different questions about expectations at the same time merely increases the effect. The implications for the assessment of citizen expectations are discussed.

AB - Citizens’ expectations are a primary source of information for politicians and public managers when developing public policies in democracies. Moreover, expectations are thought to have extensive influence on how citizens evaluate the resulting policy. If politicians want citizens who are satisfied with public services,they need to address these expectations. Theories of expectation formation tell us that two general forms of expectations exist: predictive and normative. Predictive expectations are about how a future service will be, whereas normative expectations concern how it should be. But do citizens make this distinction? If they perceiveand express their expectations differently than the theory predicts, it might affect the knowledge that we have on citizen expectations and their effects. This study investigates whether citizens have different interpretations of expectations and whether making them aware of the distinctions between predictive and normativeexpectations causes them to change their expectations. Results show that citizens interpret expectations very differently and that experimentally posing different questions about expectations at the same time merely increases the effect. The implications for the assessment of citizen expectations are discussed.

KW - Citizen Expectations

KW - Satisfaction

KW - Experiment

U2 - 10.30636/jbpa.31.72

DO - 10.30636/jbpa.31.72

M3 - Journal article

VL - 3

SP - 1

EP - 11

JO - Journal of Behavioral Public Administration

JF - Journal of Behavioral Public Administration

SN - 2576-6465

IS - 1

ER -