Innovative competences, the financial crisis and firm-level productivity in Denmark and Finland

Carter Bloch*, Carita Eklund, Hannu Piekkola

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journal/Conference contribution in journal/Contribution to newspaperJournal articleResearchpeer-review

3 Citations (Scopus)
77 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

This paper examines how intangible assets contribute to firm-level productivity in the small open economies of Denmark and Finland from 2000 to 2013. We examine whether the role of intangible assets has changed over time, from the period of fairly stable growth prior to the crisis in 2008 to the more difficult period of recovery afterwards where intangible capital deepening decreased in 2008–2013 in many European countries. The productivity analysis is conducted in two stages. First, we derive total factor productivity (TFP), and second, we estimate the effects of intangible assets on total factor productivity. Our approach for measuring intangible assets is based on occupational classifications in a linked employer–employee dataset. We construct measures for three types of intangibles: broad R&D assets (R&D), organizational assets (OC) and information and communication technology assets (ICT). In both countries, the TFP effects of broad R&D increase slightly in the period after the crisis. For Finland, we also find that the TFP effects of OC increase after the crisis, while Denmark experienced a considerable increase in OC assets after financial crises in intangible intensive industries such as information, education and health industries, where productivity is lower.

Original languageEnglish
JournalEconomics of Innovation and New Technology
Volume32
Issue2
Pages (from-to)198-212
Number of pages15
ISSN1043-8599
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2023

Keywords

  • financial crisis
  • firm-level data
  • Intangible assets
  • measurement
  • productivity

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Innovative competences, the financial crisis and firm-level productivity in Denmark and Finland'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this