Aarhus University Seal

Inference of purifying and positive selection in three subspecies of chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) from exome sequencing

Research output: Contribution to journal/Conference contribution in journal/Contribution to newspaperJournal articleResearchpeer-review

DOI

  • Thomas Bataillon
  • Jinjie Duan
  • Christina Hvilsom, Copenhagen Zoo, University of Copenhagen
  • ,
  • Xin Jin, BGI-Shenzhen, Shenzhen 518083, China
  • ,
  • Yingrui Li, BGI-Shenzhen, Shenzhen 518083, China
  • ,
  • Laurits Skov
  • Sylvain Glemin, University of Montpellier 2
  • ,
  • Kasper Munch
  • Tao Jiang
  • ,
  • Yu Qian
  • ,
  • Asger Hobolth
  • Jun Wang, BGI-Shenzhen, Shenzhen 518083, China, University of Copenhagen, The Department of Genetic Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Princess Al Jawhara Albrahim Center of Excellence in the Research of Hereditary Disorders, King Abdulaziz University, Macau University of Science and Technology, China
  • Thomas Mailund
  • ,
  • Hans R Siegismund, University of Copenhagen
  • ,
  • Mikkel H Schierup

We study genome-wide nucleotide diversity in three subspecies of extant chimpanzees using exome capture. After strict filtering, Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms and indels were called and genotyped for greater than 50% of exons at a mean coverage of 35× per individual. Central chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes troglodytes) are the most polymorphic (nucleotide diversity, θw = 0.0023 per site) followed by Eastern (P. t. schweinfurthii) chimpanzees (θw = 0.0016) and Western (P. t. verus) chimpanzees (θw = 0.0008). A demographic scenario of divergence without gene flow fits the patterns of autosomal synonymous nucleotide diversity well except for a signal of recent gene flow from Western into Eastern chimpanzees. The striking contrast in X-linked versus autosomal polymorphism and divergence previously reported in Central chimpanzees is also found in Eastern and Western chimpanzees. We show that the direction of selection statistic exhibits a strong nonmonotonic relationship with the strength of purifying selection S, making it inappropriate for estimating S. We instead use counts in synonymous versus nonsynonymous frequency classes to infer the distribution of S coefficients acting on nonsynonymous mutations in each subspecies. The strength of purifying selection we infer is congruent with the differences in effective sizes of each subspecies: Central chimpanzees are undergoing the strongest purifying selection followed by Eastern and Western chimpanzees. Coding indels show stronger selection against indels changing the reading frame than observed in human populations.

Original languageEnglish
JournalGenome Biology and Evolution
Volume7
Issue4
Pages (from-to)1122-32
Number of pages11
ISSN1759-6653
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Apr 2015

See relations at Aarhus University Citationformats

ID: 93347905