Aarhus University Seal

Induction, Rationality, and the Realism/Anti-realism Debate: A Reply to Shech

Research output: Contribution to journal/Conference contribution in journal/Contribution to newspaperComment/debate/letter to the editorResearchpeer-review

Shech (2022) offers a critical assessment of my defense of anti-realism, developed in Resisting Scientific Realism. Induction and inductive inferences play a central role in Shech’s critical analysis of my defense of realism. I argue that Shech’s criticisms that relate to induction and inductive inference are problematic, and do not constitute a threat to my defense of anti-realism. Contrary to what Shech claims, the anti-realist does not need to explain why inductive inferences are successful. That is not part of contemporary realism/anti-realism debate. Further, such a demand fails to recognize that some anti-realists do not put much stock in induction.
Original languageEnglish
JournalInternational Studies in the Philosophy of Science
Volume34
Issue4
Number of pages5
ISSN0269-8595
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2021

    Research areas

  • anti-realism;, inductive inferences;, scientific rationality;, Darwinian/selectionist explanation;, the success of science

See relations at Aarhus University Citationformats

ID: 278013652