Centre for Alcohol and Drug Research

Improving measurement of harms from others' drinking: Using item-response theory to scale harms from others' heavy drinking in 10 countries

Research output: Contribution to journal/Conference contribution in journal/Contribution to newspaperJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  • Ulrike Grittner, Charité - University Medicine, Berlin, Berlin Institute of Health (BIH), Germany
  • Kim Bloomfield
  • Sandra Kuntsche, La Trobe University, Australia
  • Sarah Callinan, La Trobe University, Australia
  • Oliver Stanesby, La Trobe University, Australia
  • Gerhard Gmel, The University of the West of England, University of Lausanne, Addiction Switzerland, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto/London, Canada, Switzerland

Introduction: The heavy drinking of others may negatively affect an individual on several dimensions of life. Until now, there is scarce research about how to judge the severity of various experiences of such harms. This study aims to empirically scale the severity of such harm items and to determine who is at most risk of these harms. Methods: We used population-based survey data from 10 countries of the GENAHTO project (Gender and Alcohol's Harms to Others, data collection: 2011–2016). Questions about harms from others' drinking asked about verbal and physical harm, damage of belongings, traffic accidents, harassment, threatening behaviour, family and financial problems. We used item response theory methods (IRT) to scale severity of the aforementioned items. To acknowledge culturally based variations in different countries, we assessed ‘differential item functioning’. Results: The items ‘family problems’, ‘financial problems’ and ‘clothes and property damage’ as well as ‘physical harm’ were scaled as more severe in most countries compared to other items. Substantial differential item functioning was present in more than half of the country pairings. The item ‘financial problems’ was most often differentially scaled. Younger people who drank more, as well as women (compared to men), reported more harm. Discussion and Conclusions: Using IRT, we were able to evaluate grades of severity in harms from others' drinking. IRT scaling yielded in similar rankings of items as reported from other studies. However, empirical scaling allows for more differentiated severity scaling than simple summary scores and is more sensitive to cultural differences.

Original languageEnglish
JournalDrug and Alcohol Review
Volume41
Issue3
Pages (from-to)577-587
ISSN0959-5236
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2022

    Research areas

  • alcohol, harms to others, item response theory, scaling

See relations at Aarhus University Citationformats

ID: 226342517