Imaginary network motifs: Structural patterns of false positives and negatives in social networks

Kyosuke Tanaka*, George Vega Yon

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journal/Conference contribution in journal/Contribution to newspaperJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

We examine the structural patterns in the cognitive representation of social networks by systematically classifying false positives and negatives. Although existing literature on Cognitive Social Structures (CSS) has begun exploring false positives and negatives by comparing actual and perceived networks, it has not differentiated simultaneous occurrences of true and false positives and negatives on network motifs, such as reciprocity and triadic closure. Here, we propose a theoretical framework to categorize three classes of errors we call imaginary network motifs as combinations of accurately and erroneously perceived ties: (a) partially false, (b) completely false, and (c) mixed false. Using four published CSS data sets, we empirically test which imaginary network motifs are significantly more or less present in different types of perceived networks than the corresponding actual networks. Our results confirm that people not only fill in the blanks as suggested in the prior research but also conceive other imaginary structures. The findings advance our understanding of perception gaps between actual and perceived networks and have implications for designing more accurate network modeling and sampling.

Original languageEnglish
JournalSocial Networks
Volume78
Pages (from-to)65-80
Number of pages16
ISSN0378-8733
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jul 2024

Keywords

  • Social Networks
  • Network Perceptions
  • Cognitive Social Structures
  • Network Motifs
  • Cognitive Errors
  • Cognitive errors
  • Network perceptions
  • Social networks
  • Network motifs

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Imaginary network motifs: Structural patterns of false positives and negatives in social networks'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this