TY - JOUR
T1 - Hydrothermal carbonization and pyrolysis in wetland engineering
T2 - Carbon sequestration, phosphorus recovery, and structural characterization of willow-based chars with X-ray μ-computed tomography
AU - Acosta, Andrés C.
AU - Arias, Carlos A.
AU - Biller, Patrick
AU - Wittig, Nina K.
AU - Baragau, Ioan Alexandru
AU - Alhnidi, M. Jamal
AU - Ravenni, Giulia
AU - Sárossy, Zsuzsa
AU - Benedini, Lidia
AU - Abramiuc, Laura Elena
AU - Popescu, Dana Georgeta
AU - Negassa, Wakene
AU - Marulanda, Victor F.
AU - Müller-Stöver, Dorette S.
AU - Brix, Hans
PY - 2024/7
Y1 - 2024/7
N2 - Willows from engineered wetland systems (EWS) offer a sustainable approach to wastewater treatment and biomass production. Our study assesses their potential for nutrient recovery and carbon sequestration using slow pyrolysis (600 °C) and hydrothermal carbonization (250 °C). Here, we propose EWS-pyrochars as a ready-to integrate opportunity for soil amendment, as they exhibit a predominant CO2 release and the absence of harmful compounds in pyrolysis-chromatograms, indicating higher stability than hydrochars. Using sequential P-extractions, we observed a high bioavailability in the willow-woodchips and a significant P-retention in EWS-chars—up to 92 % in pyrochars and near-complete retention in hydrochars, along with a higher labile-P fraction of 21 % in hydrochars than 5 % in pyrochars. Utilizing X-ray-based techniques, Raman spectroscopy, scanning electron microscopy, and gas physisorption, we characterized the EWS-chars' structures. We revealed innovative 3D-visualizations, which transcend previous literature by providing insights into the chars' internal porosity and quantifying, for the first time, their carbonaceous structural thickness via a meshing algorithm and the mean Feret diameter. EWS-pyrochars exhibit remarkable aromaticity with a higher concentration of overall sp2 C-atoms at 63 % vs. 43 % in hydrochars. Moreover, unlike hydrochars, which depict occluded porosity, EWS-pyrochars exhibited 92 % water storage-like pores. Although hydrochars indicated lower carbonization and thermal stability than pyrochars, their higher carbon retention (55 vs. 41 % in pyrochar) suggest superior annual benefits—on a 10 ha EWS scale—of 80-tons of carbon sequestration and 334 kg of phosphorus recovery versus 60-tons of carbon and 298 kg of phosphorus with pyrochars. Our findings suggest innovative materials for resource recovery, advancing the engineered wetland systems field, shifting their traditional use, and opening the opportunity for future integration into biorefineries.
AB - Willows from engineered wetland systems (EWS) offer a sustainable approach to wastewater treatment and biomass production. Our study assesses their potential for nutrient recovery and carbon sequestration using slow pyrolysis (600 °C) and hydrothermal carbonization (250 °C). Here, we propose EWS-pyrochars as a ready-to integrate opportunity for soil amendment, as they exhibit a predominant CO2 release and the absence of harmful compounds in pyrolysis-chromatograms, indicating higher stability than hydrochars. Using sequential P-extractions, we observed a high bioavailability in the willow-woodchips and a significant P-retention in EWS-chars—up to 92 % in pyrochars and near-complete retention in hydrochars, along with a higher labile-P fraction of 21 % in hydrochars than 5 % in pyrochars. Utilizing X-ray-based techniques, Raman spectroscopy, scanning electron microscopy, and gas physisorption, we characterized the EWS-chars' structures. We revealed innovative 3D-visualizations, which transcend previous literature by providing insights into the chars' internal porosity and quantifying, for the first time, their carbonaceous structural thickness via a meshing algorithm and the mean Feret diameter. EWS-pyrochars exhibit remarkable aromaticity with a higher concentration of overall sp2 C-atoms at 63 % vs. 43 % in hydrochars. Moreover, unlike hydrochars, which depict occluded porosity, EWS-pyrochars exhibited 92 % water storage-like pores. Although hydrochars indicated lower carbonization and thermal stability than pyrochars, their higher carbon retention (55 vs. 41 % in pyrochar) suggest superior annual benefits—on a 10 ha EWS scale—of 80-tons of carbon sequestration and 334 kg of phosphorus recovery versus 60-tons of carbon and 298 kg of phosphorus with pyrochars. Our findings suggest innovative materials for resource recovery, advancing the engineered wetland systems field, shifting their traditional use, and opening the opportunity for future integration into biorefineries.
KW - Carbon sequestration
KW - Engineered wetland systems
KW - Hydrothermal carbonization
KW - Phosphorus recovery
KW - Pyrolysis
KW - X-ray micro-computed tomography
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85193201093&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.cej.2024.151916
DO - 10.1016/j.cej.2024.151916
M3 - Journal article
AN - SCOPUS:85193201093
SN - 1385-8947
VL - 492
JO - Chemical Engineering Journal
JF - Chemical Engineering Journal
M1 - 151916
ER -