How do we know who may replace each other in triadic conflict roles?

Lotte Thomsen

doi:10.1017/S0140525X21001473

How do we know who may replace each other in triadic conflict roles?

^*Corresponding author for this work

Department of Political Science

Research output: Contribution to journal/Conference contribution in journal/Contribution to newspaper › Journal article › Research › peer-review

Abstract

Group representations need not reduce to triadic conflict roles, although we infer group membership from them. A conceptual primitive of <group> as one solidary, bounded unity or clique may motivate and facilitate reasoning about cooperative group interactions in context with and without intergroup conflict and may also be necessary for representing which agents would replace one another in a triadic conflict.

Original language	English
Article number	e124
Journal	Behavioral and Brain Sciences
Volume	45
ISSN	0140-525X
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X21001473
Publication status	Published - Jul 2022

Access to Document

10.1017/S0140525X21001473

OpenUrl availability

Full text

Cite this

@article{c2dc25ede52e4ef6a2d68e296cb1e94f,

title = "How do we know who may replace each other in triadic conflict roles?",

abstract = "Group representations need not reduce to triadic conflict roles, although we infer group membership from them. A conceptual primitive of as one solidary, bounded unity or clique may motivate and facilitate reasoning about cooperative group interactions in context with and without intergroup conflict and may also be necessary for representing which agents would replace one another in a triadic conflict. ",

author = "Lotte Thomsen",

note = "Publisher Copyright: Copyright {\textcopyright} The Author(s), 2022.",

year = "2022",

month = jul,

doi = "10.1017/S0140525X21001473",

language = "English",

volume = "45",

journal = "Behavioral and Brain Sciences",