Governing the Hazards of Climate: The Development of the National Climate Program Act, 1977-1981

Research output: Contribution to journal/Conference contribution in journal/Contribution to newspaperJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Standard

Governing the Hazards of Climate : The Development of the National Climate Program Act, 1977-1981. / Henderson, Gabriel.

In: Historical Studies in the Natural Sciences, Vol. 46, No. 2, 04.2016, p. 207-242.

Research output: Contribution to journal/Conference contribution in journal/Contribution to newspaperJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Henderson, G 2016, 'Governing the Hazards of Climate: The Development of the National Climate Program Act, 1977-1981', Historical Studies in the Natural Sciences, vol. 46, no. 2, pp. 207-242. https://doi.org/10.1525/hsns.2016.46.2.207

APA

CBE

MLA

Vancouver

Author

Henderson, Gabriel. / Governing the Hazards of Climate : The Development of the National Climate Program Act, 1977-1981. In: Historical Studies in the Natural Sciences. 2016 ; Vol. 46, No. 2. pp. 207-242.

Bibtex

@article{b5a813e74974484d9a213402c64e3236,
title = "Governing the Hazards of Climate: The Development of the National Climate Program Act, 1977-1981",
abstract = "During the late 1970s, some members of the United States Congress introduced seminal legislation to ameliorate what they believed to be the economic costs of climatic change. Concerned that American society had become too sensitive to the stresses of even minor climatic fluctuations as manifest in recent weather-related crises, many felt that congressional legislation was necessary to foster greater cooperation between various groups-state climatologists; agricultural researchers; local, state, and federal policy makers; private and public industries. The hope was that greater coordination of the nation's economic and scientific resources would stimulate a more flexible and resilient society, while allowing the implementation of a more service-driven approach to climate governance. Despite congressional urgency, however, the Carter Administration-specifically the Office of Management and Budget and the Office of Science and Technology Policy-challenged congressional efforts on the grounds that accommodating user needs was both scientifically unjustified and politically irresponsible. Relying heavily on what officials perceived to be the collective judgment of federal science administrators and agency heads, the Administration favored instead a more research-oriented climate program committed to improving the reliability of climate prediction and more effectively coordinating a national response. Even after President Carter reluctantly signed the National Climate Program Act in September 1978, the Administration nonetheless persisted in its effort to stifle the implementation of a service-oriented program.",
keywords = "climate governance, science advising, environmental politics, Sunbelt conservatism, Carter Administration",
author = "Gabriel Henderson",
year = "2016",
month = apr,
doi = "10.1525/hsns.2016.46.2.207",
language = "English",
volume = "46",
pages = "207--242",
journal = "Historical Studies in the Natural Sciences",
issn = "1939-1811",
publisher = "University of California Press Journals Division",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Governing the Hazards of Climate

T2 - The Development of the National Climate Program Act, 1977-1981

AU - Henderson, Gabriel

PY - 2016/4

Y1 - 2016/4

N2 - During the late 1970s, some members of the United States Congress introduced seminal legislation to ameliorate what they believed to be the economic costs of climatic change. Concerned that American society had become too sensitive to the stresses of even minor climatic fluctuations as manifest in recent weather-related crises, many felt that congressional legislation was necessary to foster greater cooperation between various groups-state climatologists; agricultural researchers; local, state, and federal policy makers; private and public industries. The hope was that greater coordination of the nation's economic and scientific resources would stimulate a more flexible and resilient society, while allowing the implementation of a more service-driven approach to climate governance. Despite congressional urgency, however, the Carter Administration-specifically the Office of Management and Budget and the Office of Science and Technology Policy-challenged congressional efforts on the grounds that accommodating user needs was both scientifically unjustified and politically irresponsible. Relying heavily on what officials perceived to be the collective judgment of federal science administrators and agency heads, the Administration favored instead a more research-oriented climate program committed to improving the reliability of climate prediction and more effectively coordinating a national response. Even after President Carter reluctantly signed the National Climate Program Act in September 1978, the Administration nonetheless persisted in its effort to stifle the implementation of a service-oriented program.

AB - During the late 1970s, some members of the United States Congress introduced seminal legislation to ameliorate what they believed to be the economic costs of climatic change. Concerned that American society had become too sensitive to the stresses of even minor climatic fluctuations as manifest in recent weather-related crises, many felt that congressional legislation was necessary to foster greater cooperation between various groups-state climatologists; agricultural researchers; local, state, and federal policy makers; private and public industries. The hope was that greater coordination of the nation's economic and scientific resources would stimulate a more flexible and resilient society, while allowing the implementation of a more service-driven approach to climate governance. Despite congressional urgency, however, the Carter Administration-specifically the Office of Management and Budget and the Office of Science and Technology Policy-challenged congressional efforts on the grounds that accommodating user needs was both scientifically unjustified and politically irresponsible. Relying heavily on what officials perceived to be the collective judgment of federal science administrators and agency heads, the Administration favored instead a more research-oriented climate program committed to improving the reliability of climate prediction and more effectively coordinating a national response. Even after President Carter reluctantly signed the National Climate Program Act in September 1978, the Administration nonetheless persisted in its effort to stifle the implementation of a service-oriented program.

KW - climate governance

KW - science advising

KW - environmental politics

KW - Sunbelt conservatism

KW - Carter Administration

U2 - 10.1525/hsns.2016.46.2.207

DO - 10.1525/hsns.2016.46.2.207

M3 - Journal article

VL - 46

SP - 207

EP - 242

JO - Historical Studies in the Natural Sciences

JF - Historical Studies in the Natural Sciences

SN - 1939-1811

IS - 2

ER -