Gender differences in promotion into top-management jobs

Linda Bell, Nina Smith, Valdemar Smith, Mette Verner

    Research output: Working paper/Preprint Working paperResearch

    848 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    In this paper the promotion process of top executive officers (CEOs) in Danish private firms is analysed. The main research question to be analysed is whether the lower chances for women to become promoted into top management jobs are mainly attributable to individual background characteristics and special focus is given to the effects of family related variables. The descriptive statistics suggest that the family background (marital status, number of children, spouse labour force participation, education and occupation) differs substantially by gender of individuals in top management. Furthermore, we will try to detect whether women in women-led companies are more likely to be promoted than women in firms managed by men only. The regression results show that the child variables have different effects for women (none) than for men (positive). This is interpreted as evidence of statistical discrimination of women, as the (potential) negative effect of children and parental leave behaviour is included in the constant term and hence applies to all women in the pool of potentials. Furthermore, males' career opportunities are declining if the wife is working, whereas the women's careers are only affected if their husbands have a high level occupation. The results also suggest that women employed in women-led firms are more likely to be promoted than in the case of not women-led firms.
    Original languageEnglish
    Place of publicationAarhus
    PublisherAarhus School of Business
    Number of pages26
    ISBN (Print)9788778823830
    ISBN (Electronic)9788778823847
    Publication statusPublished - 2008

    Keywords

    • Promotion process
    • Gender differences
    • Top management

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Gender differences in promotion into top-management jobs'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this