Gender and Nominal Power in Multilateral Bargaining

Nicola Maaser*, Fabian Paetzel, Stefan Traub

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journal/Conference contribution in journal/Contribution to newspaperJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

In many bargaining situations, the distribution of seats or voting weights does not accurately reflect bargaining power. Maaser, Paetzel and Traub (Games and Economic Behavior, 2019) conducted an experiment to investigate the effect of such nominal power differences in the classic Baron–Ferejohn model. This paper re-analyzes the data from that experiment, looking at gender differences in bargaining behavior and in the effect of nominal weights. We find that women and men differ in particular with respect to the proposed distribution of payoffs and coalition size. By contrast, nominal weights have only minor gender-specific effects.

Original languageEnglish
Article number11
JournalGames
Volume13
Issue1
Number of pages25
ISSN2073-4336
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2022

Keywords

  • Bargaining
  • Gender differences
  • Laboratory experiment

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Gender and Nominal Power in Multilateral Bargaining'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this