Fractional flow reserve derived from coronary computed tomography angiography: diagnostic performance in hypertensive and diabetic patients

Research output: Contribution to journal/Conference contribution in journal/Contribution to newspaperJournal articleResearchpeer-review

DOI

  • Ashkan Eftekhari
  • ,
  • James Min, Weill Cornell Medical College, Dalio Institute of Cardiovascular Imagaing, New York-Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY, USA.
  • ,
  • Stephan Achenbach, Department of Cardiology, University of Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany.
  • ,
  • Mohamed Marwan, Department of Cardiology, University of Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany.
  • ,
  • Matthew Budoff, Department of Medicine, Los Angeles Biomedical Research Center, Torrance, CA, USA.
  • ,
  • Jonathon Leipsic, Division of Cardiology, Department of Radiology, St. Paul's Hospital, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
  • ,
  • Sara Gaur
  • ,
  • Jesper Møller Jensen
  • Brian S Ko, Department of Cardiology, University of Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany.
  • ,
  • Evald Høj Christiansen
  • Anne Kaltoft
  • ,
  • Hans Erik Bøtker
  • Jens Flensted Jensen
  • ,
  • Bjarne Linde Nørgaard

AIMS: Fractional flow reserve (FFR) derived from coronary computed tomography (FFRCT) has high diagnostic performance in stable coronary artery disease (CAD). The diagnostic performance of FFRCT in patients with hypertension (HTN) and diabetes (DM), who are at risk of microvascular impairment, is not known.

METHODS AND RESULTS: We analysed the diagnostic performance of FFRCT, in patients (vessels) with DM (n = 16), HTN (n = 186), DM + HTN (n = 58) vs. controls (n = 107) with or with suspected CAD. Patients (vessels) were further divided according to left ventricular mass index (LVMI) tertiles. Reference standard was invasively measured FFR ≤0.80. Per-patient diagnostic accuracy (95% CI) in control patients was 71.7% (61.6-81.8) vs. 79.3 (74.0-85.0) (P = 0.12), 75.0% (47.6-92.7) (P = 0.52), and 75.9% (62.8-86.1) (P = 0.39) in patients with HTN, DM, and HTM + DM, respectively. There was no difference in discrimination of ischaemia by FFRCT between groups. On a per-vessel level, there was no significant difference in diagnostic performance or discrimination of ischaemia by FFRCT between groups. There was a decline in both per-patient and -vessel diagnostic specificity of FFRCT in the upper LVMI tertile when compared with lower tertiles; however, discrimination of ischaemia by FFRCT was unaltered across LVMI tertiles.

CONCLUSION: The diagnostic performance of FFRCT is independent of the presence of HTN and DM. FFRCT is a robust method in a broad stable CAD population, including patients at high risk for microvascular disease.

Original languageEnglish
JournalEuropean Heart Journal Cardiovascular Imaging
Volume18
Issue12
Pages (from-to)1351-1360
Number of pages10
ISSN2047-2404
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Dec 2017

See relations at Aarhus University Citationformats

ID: 107585563