Abstract
The Faroe Islands is receiving increased international attention due to the political changes in the Arctic region. This is causing challenges for the Home Rule model and the Danish Realm. The Faroe Islands have previous experiences with critical junctures that have led to change in self-government settings. Based on historical institutionalism, this article conducts a comparative case study of two previous critical juncture events and time-periods for the Faroe Islands. The first is the Second World War followed by the implementation of the new Home Rule model in 1948, and the second is the severe economic crisis in the 1990s followed by path dependency institutional adaptations to the Home Rule model in 2005. The investigation resembles a different-outcomes comparison and focuses on identifying the contextual political factors of importance and how these factors varied for the two cases. The findings show shifts in the within-case political power balance in opposite directions, changes in the policy space, differences in the Danish state´s position and third-party actor roles as well as differences in terms of international salience of national self-determination norms.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Journal | The Polar Journal |
| Volume | 14 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages (from-to) | 28-47 |
| Number of pages | 20 |
| ISSN | 2154-896X |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 22 Apr 2024 |
Keywords
- Danish Realm
- Faroe Islands
- critical junctures
- path dependency
- self-government