Exploring the relationship between simulation-based team training and sick leave among healthcare professionals: a cohort study across multiple hospital sites

TY - JOUR

T1 - Exploring the relationship between simulation-based team training and sick leave among healthcare professionals

T2 - a cohort study across multiple hospital sites

AU - Schram, Anders

AU - Jensen, Hanne Irene

AU - Gamborg, Maria

AU - Lindhard, Morten

AU - Rölfing, Jan

AU - Kjaergaard-Andersen, Gunhild

AU - Bie, Magnus

AU - Jensen, Rune Dall

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

PY - 2023/10

Y1 - 2023/10

N2 - OBJECTIVE: Burnout and mental illness are frequent among healthcare professionals, leading to increased sick leave. Simulation-based team training has been shown to improve job satisfaction and mental health among healthcare professionals. This study seeks to investigate the relationship between simulation-based team training and sick leave. DESIGN: Cohort study. SETTING AND INTERVENTION: Five Danish hospitals. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 15 751 individuals were screened for eligibility. To meet the eligibility criteria, individuals had to be employed in the same group (intervention or control) for the whole study period. A total of 14 872 individuals were eligible for analysis in the study. INTERVENTION: From 2017 to 2019, a simulation-based team training intervention was implemented at two hospital sites. Three hospital sites served as the control group. OUTCOME MEASURES: Data on sick leave from 2015 to 2020 covered five hospital sites. Using a difference-in-difference analysis, the rate of sick leave was compared across hospital sites (intervention vs control) and time periods (before vs after intervention). RESULTS: Significant alterations in sick leave were evident when comparing the intervention and control groups. When comparing groups over time, the increase in sick leave was -0.3% (95% CI -0.6% to -0.0%) lower in the intervention group than in the control group. The difference-in-difference for the complete case analysis showed that this trend remained consistent, with analysis indicating a comparable lower increase in sick leave by -0.7% (95% CI -1.3% to -0.1%) in the intervention group. CONCLUSION: The increase in sick leave rate was statistically significantly lower in the intervention group, implying that simulation-based team training could serve as a protective factor against sick leave. However, when investigating this simulation intervention over 5 years, other potential factors may have influenced sick leave, so caution is required when interpreting the results.

AB - OBJECTIVE: Burnout and mental illness are frequent among healthcare professionals, leading to increased sick leave. Simulation-based team training has been shown to improve job satisfaction and mental health among healthcare professionals. This study seeks to investigate the relationship between simulation-based team training and sick leave. DESIGN: Cohort study. SETTING AND INTERVENTION: Five Danish hospitals. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 15 751 individuals were screened for eligibility. To meet the eligibility criteria, individuals had to be employed in the same group (intervention or control) for the whole study period. A total of 14 872 individuals were eligible for analysis in the study. INTERVENTION: From 2017 to 2019, a simulation-based team training intervention was implemented at two hospital sites. Three hospital sites served as the control group. OUTCOME MEASURES: Data on sick leave from 2015 to 2020 covered five hospital sites. Using a difference-in-difference analysis, the rate of sick leave was compared across hospital sites (intervention vs control) and time periods (before vs after intervention). RESULTS: Significant alterations in sick leave were evident when comparing the intervention and control groups. When comparing groups over time, the increase in sick leave was -0.3% (95% CI -0.6% to -0.0%) lower in the intervention group than in the control group. The difference-in-difference for the complete case analysis showed that this trend remained consistent, with analysis indicating a comparable lower increase in sick leave by -0.7% (95% CI -1.3% to -0.1%) in the intervention group. CONCLUSION: The increase in sick leave rate was statistically significantly lower in the intervention group, implying that simulation-based team training could serve as a protective factor against sick leave. However, when investigating this simulation intervention over 5 years, other potential factors may have influenced sick leave, so caution is required when interpreting the results.

KW - EPIDEMIOLOGY

KW - Health Education

KW - MEDICAL EDUCATION & TRAINING

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85175404011&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-076163

DO - 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-076163

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 37899150

AN - SCOPUS:85175404011

SN - 2044-6055

VL - 13

JO - BMJ Open

JF - BMJ Open

IS - 10

M1 - e076163

ER -