Evaluative conversations:: Translating between diverse stakeholders in regional RRI projects

Tjitske  Holtrop; Ingeborg Meijer; Paula Ootero-hermida; Anestis  Amanatidis; Chiara  Buongiovanni; Donatella  Casale; Claudia Colonnello; Alessandro  Deserti; Fabio Feudo; Alan Hartman; Marianne Hörlesberger; Ildiko M. Ipolyi; Nhien  Nguyen; Mika Nieminen; Gabriele  Quinti; Tine Ravn; Francesca  Rizzo; Felicitas  Schmittinger; Norbert  Steinhaus; Roger Strand; Thomas  Völker; Rene  Wintjes; Emad Yaghmaei

doi:10.22163/fteval.2022.544

Evaluative conversations: Translating between diverse stakeholders in regional RRI projects

Tjitske Holtrop, Ingeborg Meijer, Paula Ootero-hermida, Anestis Amanatidis, Chiara Buongiovanni, Donatella Casale, Claudia Colonnello, Alessandro Deserti, Fabio Feudo, Alan Hartman, Marianne Hörlesberger, Ildiko M. Ipolyi, Nhien Nguyen, Mika Nieminen, Gabriele Quinti, Tine Ravn, Francesca Rizzo, Felicitas Schmittinger, Norbert Steinhaus, Roger StrandThomas Völker, Rene Wintjes, Emad Yaghmaei

Department of Political Science - Danish Centre for Studies in Research and Research Policy

Research output: Contribution to journal/Conference contribution in journal/Contribution to newspaper › Comment/debate/letter to the editor › Communication

Abstract

Since the summer of 2020, researchers from ten projects pertaining to the Horizon2020 Science with and for Society (SwafS) call have been meeting virtually as the SwafS14 Monitoring and Evaluation ecosystem. Topics of discussion were the trials and tribulations of their regional Responsible Research and Innovation (RRI) projects as well as their strategies for monitoring and evaluation. In this paper we make a first attempt at presenting these issues as problems of translation between different kinds of stakeholders. After an exploration of the diversity of stakeholders and the process of translation in regional RRI, we suggest evaluative conversations as a way of improving regional RRI. We intend to develop this idea in the future and that these conversations will facilitate more responsible and engaged monitoring and evaluation and contribute to better R&I policies.

Original language	English
Journal	fteval Journal for Science and Technology Policy Evaluation
Volume	53
Pages (from-to)	77-84
Number of pages	8
ISSN	1726-6629
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.22163/fteval.2022.544
Publication status	Published - Apr 2022

Access to Document

10.22163/fteval.2022.544

https://repository.fteval.at/604/1/07fteval_J53_10.22163_fteval.2022.544.pdf

Cite this

Holtrop, T., Meijer, I., Ootero-hermida, P., Amanatidis, A., Buongiovanni, C., Casale, D., Colonnello, C., Deserti, A., Feudo, F., Hartman, A., Hörlesberger, M., Ipolyi, I. M., Nguyen, N., Nieminen, M., Quinti, G., Ravn, T., Rizzo, F., Schmittinger, F., Steinhaus, N., ... Yaghmaei, E. (2022). Evaluative conversations: Translating between diverse stakeholders in regional RRI projects. fteval Journal for Science and Technology Policy Evaluation, 53, 77-84. https://doi.org/10.22163/fteval.2022.544

@article{8e2732389a2441499ff98c22a7dcc7d0,

title = "Evaluative conversations:: Translating between diverse stakeholders in regional RRI projects",

abstract = "Since the summer of 2020, researchers from ten projects pertaining to the Horizon2020 Science with and for Society (SwafS) call have been meeting virtually as the SwafS14 Monitoring and Evaluation ecosystem. Topics of discussion were the trials and tribulations of their regional Responsible Research and Innovation (RRI) projects as well as their strategies for monitoring and evaluation. In this paper we make a first attempt at presenting these issues as problems of translation between different kinds of stakeholders. After an exploration of the diversity of stakeholders and the process of translation in regional RRI, we suggest evaluative conversations as a way of improving regional RRI. We intend to develop this idea in the future and that these conversations will facilitate more responsible and engaged monitoring and evaluation and contribute to better R&I policies.",

author = "Tjitske Holtrop and Ingeborg Meijer and Paula Ootero-hermida and Anestis Amanatidis and Chiara Buongiovanni and Donatella Casale and Claudia Colonnello and Alessandro Deserti and Fabio Feudo and Alan Hartman and Marianne H{\"o}rlesberger and Ipolyi, {Ildiko M.} and Nhien Nguyen and Mika Nieminen and Gabriele Quinti and Tine Ravn and Francesca Rizzo and Felicitas Schmittinger and Norbert Steinhaus and Roger Strand and Thomas V{\"o}lker and Rene Wintjes and Emad Yaghmaei",

year = "2022",

month = apr,

doi = "10.22163/fteval.2022.544",

language = "English",

volume = "53",

pages = "77--84",

journal = "fteval Journal for Science and Technology Policy Evaluation",

issn = "1726-6629",

}

Holtrop, T, Meijer, I, Ootero-hermida, P, Amanatidis, A, Buongiovanni, C, Casale, D, Colonnello, C, Deserti, A, Feudo, F, Hartman, A, Hörlesberger, M, Ipolyi, IM, Nguyen, N, Nieminen, M, Quinti, G, Ravn, T, Rizzo, F, Schmittinger, F, Steinhaus, N, Strand, R, Völker, T, Wintjes, R & Yaghmaei, E 2022, 'Evaluative conversations: Translating between diverse stakeholders in regional RRI projects', fteval Journal for Science and Technology Policy Evaluation, vol. 53, pp. 77-84. https://doi.org/10.22163/fteval.2022.544

Evaluative conversations: Translating between diverse stakeholders in regional RRI projects. / Holtrop, Tjitske ; Meijer, Ingeborg; Ootero-hermida, Paula et al.
In: fteval Journal for Science and Technology Policy Evaluation, Vol. 53, 04.2022, p. 77-84.

Research output: Contribution to journal/Conference contribution in journal/Contribution to newspaper › Comment/debate/letter to the editor › Communication

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evaluative conversations:

T2 - Translating between diverse stakeholders in regional RRI projects

AU - Holtrop, Tjitske

AU - Meijer, Ingeborg

AU - Ootero-hermida, Paula

AU - Amanatidis, Anestis

AU - Buongiovanni, Chiara

AU - Casale, Donatella

AU - Colonnello, Claudia

AU - Deserti, Alessandro

AU - Feudo, Fabio

AU - Hartman, Alan

AU - Hörlesberger, Marianne

AU - Ipolyi, Ildiko M.

AU - Nguyen, Nhien

AU - Nieminen, Mika

AU - Quinti, Gabriele

AU - Ravn, Tine

AU - Rizzo, Francesca

AU - Schmittinger, Felicitas

AU - Steinhaus, Norbert

AU - Strand, Roger

AU - Völker, Thomas

AU - Wintjes, Rene

AU - Yaghmaei, Emad

PY - 2022/4

Y1 - 2022/4

N2 - Since the summer of 2020, researchers from ten projects pertaining to the Horizon2020 Science with and for Society (SwafS) call have been meeting virtually as the SwafS14 Monitoring and Evaluation ecosystem. Topics of discussion were the trials and tribulations of their regional Responsible Research and Innovation (RRI) projects as well as their strategies for monitoring and evaluation. In this paper we make a first attempt at presenting these issues as problems of translation between different kinds of stakeholders. After an exploration of the diversity of stakeholders and the process of translation in regional RRI, we suggest evaluative conversations as a way of improving regional RRI. We intend to develop this idea in the future and that these conversations will facilitate more responsible and engaged monitoring and evaluation and contribute to better R&I policies.

AB - Since the summer of 2020, researchers from ten projects pertaining to the Horizon2020 Science with and for Society (SwafS) call have been meeting virtually as the SwafS14 Monitoring and Evaluation ecosystem. Topics of discussion were the trials and tribulations of their regional Responsible Research and Innovation (RRI) projects as well as their strategies for monitoring and evaluation. In this paper we make a first attempt at presenting these issues as problems of translation between different kinds of stakeholders. After an exploration of the diversity of stakeholders and the process of translation in regional RRI, we suggest evaluative conversations as a way of improving regional RRI. We intend to develop this idea in the future and that these conversations will facilitate more responsible and engaged monitoring and evaluation and contribute to better R&I policies.

U2 - 10.22163/fteval.2022.544

DO - 10.22163/fteval.2022.544

M3 - Comment/debate/letter to the editor

SN - 1726-6629

VL - 53

SP - 77

EP - 84

JO - fteval Journal for Science and Technology Policy Evaluation

JF - fteval Journal for Science and Technology Policy Evaluation

ER -