Evaluation of preparation methods for MS-based analysis of intestinal epithelial cell proteomes

Marianne Overgaard Hesselager, Marius Cosmin Codrea, Emøke Bendixen

    Research output: Contribution to journal/Conference contribution in journal/Contribution to newspaperJournal articleResearchpeer-review

    3 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    The gut epithelium formed between an organism and the environment plays an essential role in host–microbe interactions, yet remains one of the least characterized mammalian tissues. Especially the membrane proteins, which are critical to bacterial adhesion, are understudied, because these proteins are low in abundance, and large amounts of sample is needed for their preparation and for undertaking MS-based analysis. The aim of this study was to evaluate three different methods for isolation and preparation of pig intestinal epithelial cells for MS-based analysis of the proteome. Samples were analyzed by LC and electrospray QTOF-MS. The methods were evaluated according to efficiency, purity, transmembrane protein recovery, as well as for suitability to large-scale preparations. Our data clearly demonstrate that mucosal shaving is by far the best-suited method for in-depth MS analysis in terms of ease and speed of sample preparation, as well as protein recovery. In comparison, more gentle methods where intestinal epithelial cells are harvested by shaking are more time consuming, result in lower protein yield, and are prone to increased technical variation due to multiple steps involved.
    Original languageEnglish
    JournalProteomics
    Volume15
    Issue13
    Pages (from-to)2350-2357
    ISSN1615-9853
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Jul 2015

    Keywords

    • Animal proteomics
    • Epithelial cells
    • Preparation method
    • Shotgun LC-MS/MS
    • Small intestine

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Evaluation of preparation methods for MS-based analysis of intestinal epithelial cell proteomes'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this