Aarhus University Seal

European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology and European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer consensus on re-irradiation: definition, reporting, and clinical decision making

Research output: Contribution to journal/Conference contribution in journal/Contribution to newspaperReviewResearchpeer-review

  • Nicolaus Andratschke, University of Zurich
  • ,
  • Jonas Willmann, University of Zurich
  • ,
  • Ane L. Appelt, University of Leeds
  • ,
  • Najlaa Alyamani, European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Data Center
  • ,
  • Panagiotis Balermpas, University of Zurich
  • ,
  • Brigitta G. Baumert, Kantonsspital Graubünden
  • ,
  • Coen Hurkmans, Catharina Hospital
  • ,
  • Morten Høyer
  • Johannes A. Langendijk, University of Groningen
  • ,
  • Orit Kaidar-Person, Sheba Medical Center at Tel Hashomer, Tel Aviv University, Maastricht University
  • ,
  • Yvette van der Linden, Leiden University, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation
  • ,
  • Icro Meattini, Azienda Ospedaliera Careggi, University of Florence
  • ,
  • Maximilian Niyazi, Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich, Partner Site Munich, Bavarian Cancer Research Center (BZKF)
  • ,
  • Nick Reynaert, Université Libre de Bruxelles
  • ,
  • Dirk De Ruysscher, Maastricht University
  • ,
  • Stephanie Tanadini-Lang, University of Zurich
  • ,
  • Peter Hoskin, Manchester University
  • ,
  • Philip Poortmans, Iridium Netwerk, University of Antwerp
  • ,
  • Carsten Nieder, Northern Norway Regional Health Authority, UiT The Arctic University of Norway

Re-irradiation can be considered for local recurrence or new tumours adjacent to a previously irradiated site to achieve durable local control for patients with cancer who have otherwise few therapeutic options. With the use of new radiotherapy techniques, which allow for conformal treatment plans, image guidance, and short fractionation schemes, the use of re-irradiation for different sites is increasing in clinical settings. Yet, prospective evidence on re-irradiation is scarce and our understanding of the underlying radiobiology is poor. Our consensus on re-irradiation aims to assist in re-irradiation decision making, and to standardise the classification of different forms of re-irradiation and reporting. The consensus has been endorsed by the European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology and the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer. The use of this classification in daily clinical practice and research will facilitate accurate understanding of the clinical implications of re-irradiation and allow for cross-study comparisons. Data gathered in a uniform manner could be used in the future to make recommendations for re-irradiation on the basis of clinical evidence. The consensus document is based on an adapted Delphi process and a systematic review of the literature was done according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA).

Original languageEnglish
JournalThe Lancet Oncology
Volume23
Issue10
Pages (from-to)e469-e478
Number of pages10
ISSN1470-2045
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Oct 2022

See relations at Aarhus University Citationformats

ID: 283856556