Egalitarianism, moral status and abortion: A reply to Miller

Joona Räsänen*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journal/Conference contribution in journal/Contribution to newspaperComment/debate/letter to the editorResearchpeer-review

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Calum Miller recently argued that a commitment to a very modest form of egalitarianism - equality between non-disabled human adults - implies fetal personhood. Miller claims that the most plausible basis for human equality is in being human - an attribute which fetuses have - therefore, abortion is likely to be morally wrong. In this paper, I offer a plausible defence for the view that equality between non-disabled human adults does not imply fetal personhood. I also offer a challenge for Miller's view.

Original languageEnglish
JournalJournal of Medical Ethics
Volume49
Issue10
Pages (from-to)717-718
Number of pages2
ISSN0306-6800
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Oct 2023

Keywords

  • Abortion - Induced
  • Ethics- Medical
  • Fetus
  • Infanticide
  • Moral Status

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Egalitarianism, moral status and abortion: A reply to Miller'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this