Aarhus University Seal

Ecological and evolutionary legacy of megafauna extinctions

Research output: Contribution to journal/Conference contribution in journal/Contribution to newspaperReviewResearchpeer-review

DOI

  • Mauro Galetti
  • ,
  • Marcos Moleon, University of Granada
  • ,
  • Pedro Jordano, CSIC, CSIC - Estacion Biologica de Donana (EBD), Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Cientificas (CSIC), Estn Biol Donana, EBD SCIC
  • ,
  • Mathias M. Pires, Universidade de Sao Paulo
  • ,
  • Paulo R. Guimaraes, Universidade de Sao Paulo
  • ,
  • Thomas Pape, University of Copenhagen
  • ,
  • Elizabeth Nichols, Swarthmore Coll, Swarthmore College, Dept Biol
  • ,
  • Dennis Hansen, University of Zurich
  • ,
  • Jens M. Olesen
  • Michael Munk
  • Jacqueline S. de Mattos, Univ Estadual Paulista, Universidade Estadual Paulista, Inst Biociencias, Dept Ecol, UNESP
  • ,
  • Andreas H. Schweiger
  • ,
  • Norman Owen-Smith, University of the Witwatersrand
  • ,
  • Christopher N. Johnson, Univ Tasmania, University of Tasmania, Australian Res Council Ctr Excellence Australian
  • ,
  • Robert J. Marquis, Univ Missouri, University of Missouri System, University of Missouri Saint Louis, Whitney R Harris World Ecol Ctr
  • ,
  • Jens-Christian Svenning

For hundreds of millions of years, large vertebrates (megafauna) have inhabited most of the ecosystems on our planet. During the late Quaternary, notably during the Late Pleistocene and the early Holocene, Earth experienced a rapid extinction of large, terrestrial vertebrates. While much attention has been paid to understanding the causes of this massive megafauna extinction, less attention has been given to understanding the impacts of loss of megafauna on other organisms with whom they interacted. In this review, we discuss how the loss of megafauna disrupted and reshaped ecological interactions, and explore the ecological consequences of the ongoing decline of large vertebrates. Numerous late Quaternary extinct species of predators, parasites, commensals and mutualistic partners were associated with megafauna and were probably lost due to their strict dependence upon them (co-extinctions). Moreover, many extant species have megafauna-adapted traits that provided evolutionary benefits under past megafauna-rich conditions, but are now of no or limited use (anachronisms). Morphological evolution and behavioural changes allowed some of these species partially to overcome the absence of megafauna. Although the extinction of megafauna led to a number of co-extinction events, several species that likely co-evolved with megafauna established new interactions with humans and their domestic animals. Species that were highly specialized in interactions with megafauna, such as large predators, specialized parasites, and large commensalists (e.g. scavengers, dung beetles), and could not adapt to new hosts or prey were more likely to die out. Partners that were less megafauna dependent persisted because of behavioural plasticity or by shifting their dependency to humans via domestication, facilitation or pathogen spill-over, or through interactions with domestic megafauna. We argue that the ongoing extinction of the extant megafauna in the Anthropocene will catalyse another wave of co-extinctions due to the enormous diversity of key ecological interactions and functional roles provided by the megafauna.

Original languageEnglish
JournalBiological Reviews
Volume93
Issue2
Pages (from-to)845-862
Number of pages18
ISSN1464-7931
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - May 2018

    Research areas

  • anachronism, cerrado, botfly, seed dispersal, parasite-host interaction, dung beetles, plant defence, scavengers, megaherbivores, savanna, AFRICAN DUNG BEETLE, SEED-DISPERSAL, LATE PLEISTOCENE, BODY-SIZE, COLEOPTERA-SCARABAEIDAE, AMAZONIAN FORESTS, VAMPIRE BATS, LOXODONTA-AFRICANA, FEEDING-BEHAVIOR, LARGE HERBIVORES

See relations at Aarhus University Citationformats

ID: 126375272