Centre for Alcohol and Drug Research

Drugs and discretionary power in prisons: The officer's perspective

Research output: Contribution to journal/Conference contribution in journal/Contribution to newspaperJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Standard

Drugs and discretionary power in prisons: The officer's perspective. / Kolind, Torsten.

In: International Journal of Drug Policy, Vol. 26, No. 9, 2015, p. 799-807.

Research output: Contribution to journal/Conference contribution in journal/Contribution to newspaperJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

APA

CBE

MLA

Vancouver

Author

Kolind, Torsten. / Drugs and discretionary power in prisons: The officer's perspective. In: International Journal of Drug Policy. 2015 ; Vol. 26, No. 9. pp. 799-807.

Bibtex

@article{93715157a1574c05a8eb2ae9d287d144,
title = "Drugs and discretionary power in prisons: The officer's perspective",
abstract = "BackgroundDrugs play an increasing role in contemporary prison life. Prisoners’ drug use, drug smuggling and drug selling have also had a growing impact on the work routines and practices of prison officers. This has led to critiques that prison staff have become ‘too lenient’ regarding drug use.MethodsBased on observational data, qualitative interviews and survey data, this study examines the role of drugs in the way Danish prison officers exercise power.ResultsTwo forms of power are analysed: institutional power, by which the officers can sanction or reward inmates in everyday prison life, and personal power, by which the officers’ personal authority and skills can reduce the more intrusive aspects of prison control. These forms of power are applied by officers’ use of discretion in order to maintain what they consider to be adequate levels of peace and order in the prison wings. It is shown that officers are highly ambivalent towards the presence of drugs in prisons. On the one hand, they support the stricter drug policies implemented over the past two decades. On the other hand, they are aware that drug use can have a positive function in the everyday running of the prison. Officers’ acceptance of inmates’ drug use (mainly cannabis), therefore, is not necessarily a sign of leniency but one way in which prison officers exercise their power in prison settings.ConclusionsIt is concluded that discretionary power is still very central to the officers’ work. This conclusion contradicts recent arguments that prison officers’ agency is being threatened or restricted by ‘neoliberal’ management reforms. The prison officers’ discretion and informal power is the key to understanding their acceptance of inmates’ drug use.",
author = "Torsten Kolind",
year = "2015",
doi = "10.1016/j.drugpo.2015.04.014",
language = "English",
volume = "26",
pages = "799--807",
journal = "International Journal of Drug Policy",
issn = "0955-3959",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",
number = "9",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Drugs and discretionary power in prisons: The officer's perspective

AU - Kolind, Torsten

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - BackgroundDrugs play an increasing role in contemporary prison life. Prisoners’ drug use, drug smuggling and drug selling have also had a growing impact on the work routines and practices of prison officers. This has led to critiques that prison staff have become ‘too lenient’ regarding drug use.MethodsBased on observational data, qualitative interviews and survey data, this study examines the role of drugs in the way Danish prison officers exercise power.ResultsTwo forms of power are analysed: institutional power, by which the officers can sanction or reward inmates in everyday prison life, and personal power, by which the officers’ personal authority and skills can reduce the more intrusive aspects of prison control. These forms of power are applied by officers’ use of discretion in order to maintain what they consider to be adequate levels of peace and order in the prison wings. It is shown that officers are highly ambivalent towards the presence of drugs in prisons. On the one hand, they support the stricter drug policies implemented over the past two decades. On the other hand, they are aware that drug use can have a positive function in the everyday running of the prison. Officers’ acceptance of inmates’ drug use (mainly cannabis), therefore, is not necessarily a sign of leniency but one way in which prison officers exercise their power in prison settings.ConclusionsIt is concluded that discretionary power is still very central to the officers’ work. This conclusion contradicts recent arguments that prison officers’ agency is being threatened or restricted by ‘neoliberal’ management reforms. The prison officers’ discretion and informal power is the key to understanding their acceptance of inmates’ drug use.

AB - BackgroundDrugs play an increasing role in contemporary prison life. Prisoners’ drug use, drug smuggling and drug selling have also had a growing impact on the work routines and practices of prison officers. This has led to critiques that prison staff have become ‘too lenient’ regarding drug use.MethodsBased on observational data, qualitative interviews and survey data, this study examines the role of drugs in the way Danish prison officers exercise power.ResultsTwo forms of power are analysed: institutional power, by which the officers can sanction or reward inmates in everyday prison life, and personal power, by which the officers’ personal authority and skills can reduce the more intrusive aspects of prison control. These forms of power are applied by officers’ use of discretion in order to maintain what they consider to be adequate levels of peace and order in the prison wings. It is shown that officers are highly ambivalent towards the presence of drugs in prisons. On the one hand, they support the stricter drug policies implemented over the past two decades. On the other hand, they are aware that drug use can have a positive function in the everyday running of the prison. Officers’ acceptance of inmates’ drug use (mainly cannabis), therefore, is not necessarily a sign of leniency but one way in which prison officers exercise their power in prison settings.ConclusionsIt is concluded that discretionary power is still very central to the officers’ work. This conclusion contradicts recent arguments that prison officers’ agency is being threatened or restricted by ‘neoliberal’ management reforms. The prison officers’ discretion and informal power is the key to understanding their acceptance of inmates’ drug use.

U2 - 10.1016/j.drugpo.2015.04.014

DO - 10.1016/j.drugpo.2015.04.014

M3 - Journal article

VL - 26

SP - 799

EP - 807

JO - International Journal of Drug Policy

JF - International Journal of Drug Policy

SN - 0955-3959

IS - 9

ER -