Does Information Become Actual Knowledge in Surgical Spine Patients? A Qualitative Study

Research output: Contribution to journal/Conference contribution in journal/Contribution to newspaperJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Standard

Does Information Become Actual Knowledge in Surgical Spine Patients? A Qualitative Study. / Bidstrup, Christina Alstrup; Morthorst, Karen Rud; Laursen, Malene; Jørgensen, Lene Bastrup; Høybye, Mette Terp.

In: Orthopaedic Nursing, Vol. 37, No. 6, 2018, p. 363-371.

Research output: Contribution to journal/Conference contribution in journal/Contribution to newspaperJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

APA

CBE

MLA

Vancouver

Author

Bidstrup, Christina Alstrup ; Morthorst, Karen Rud ; Laursen, Malene ; Jørgensen, Lene Bastrup ; Høybye, Mette Terp. / Does Information Become Actual Knowledge in Surgical Spine Patients? A Qualitative Study. In: Orthopaedic Nursing. 2018 ; Vol. 37, No. 6. pp. 363-371.

Bibtex

@article{28de4b2d825b421783c275f7acbcaed5,
title = "Does Information Become Actual Knowledge in Surgical Spine Patients?: A Qualitative Study",
abstract = "BACKGROUND: It is seldom questioned, if information delivered (to a patient) actually produces knowledge. There is a lack of understanding of how patients in general, surgical patients in particular, perceive, process, and translate clinical information in their everyday lives. The objective of this study was to elucidate how patients undergoing spinal fusion surgery manage and assimilate information provided by clinicians and how they adapt and embrace this information pre- and postsurgery.METHODS: The study employed qualitative methods of ethnographic observation and semistructured interview with a total of 14 individuals, that is, spinal fusion patients (n = 6) and clinicians (n = 8) over a 4-month period in 2014.RESULTS: The results highlight that in the course of treatment, patients embrace or reject information on the basis of their previous experience, expectations, and confidence in their own ability. Overall, patients adjusting to everyday life after spinal fusion surgery used 4 strategies of information processing about their individual life situation. Patients do not use just one of these strategies but may use a number of strategies depending on the situation. Such production of knowledge is pivotal to the behavior of patients through their treatment trajectory.CONCLUSIONS: This study points to the challenges of supporting patients to assimilate information and affect health-related behaviors, recognizing that knowledge and behavior change are emergent processes in patients and not a linear outcome of information.",
author = "Bidstrup, {Christina Alstrup} and Morthorst, {Karen Rud} and Malene Laursen and J{\o}rgensen, {Lene Bastrup} and H{\o}ybye, {Mette Terp}",
year = "2018",
doi = "10.1097/NOR.0000000000000500",
language = "English",
volume = "37",
pages = "363--371",
journal = "Orthopaedic Nursing",
issn = "0744-6020",
publisher = "LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS",
number = "6",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Does Information Become Actual Knowledge in Surgical Spine Patients?

T2 - A Qualitative Study

AU - Bidstrup, Christina Alstrup

AU - Morthorst, Karen Rud

AU - Laursen, Malene

AU - Jørgensen, Lene Bastrup

AU - Høybye, Mette Terp

PY - 2018

Y1 - 2018

N2 - BACKGROUND: It is seldom questioned, if information delivered (to a patient) actually produces knowledge. There is a lack of understanding of how patients in general, surgical patients in particular, perceive, process, and translate clinical information in their everyday lives. The objective of this study was to elucidate how patients undergoing spinal fusion surgery manage and assimilate information provided by clinicians and how they adapt and embrace this information pre- and postsurgery.METHODS: The study employed qualitative methods of ethnographic observation and semistructured interview with a total of 14 individuals, that is, spinal fusion patients (n = 6) and clinicians (n = 8) over a 4-month period in 2014.RESULTS: The results highlight that in the course of treatment, patients embrace or reject information on the basis of their previous experience, expectations, and confidence in their own ability. Overall, patients adjusting to everyday life after spinal fusion surgery used 4 strategies of information processing about their individual life situation. Patients do not use just one of these strategies but may use a number of strategies depending on the situation. Such production of knowledge is pivotal to the behavior of patients through their treatment trajectory.CONCLUSIONS: This study points to the challenges of supporting patients to assimilate information and affect health-related behaviors, recognizing that knowledge and behavior change are emergent processes in patients and not a linear outcome of information.

AB - BACKGROUND: It is seldom questioned, if information delivered (to a patient) actually produces knowledge. There is a lack of understanding of how patients in general, surgical patients in particular, perceive, process, and translate clinical information in their everyday lives. The objective of this study was to elucidate how patients undergoing spinal fusion surgery manage and assimilate information provided by clinicians and how they adapt and embrace this information pre- and postsurgery.METHODS: The study employed qualitative methods of ethnographic observation and semistructured interview with a total of 14 individuals, that is, spinal fusion patients (n = 6) and clinicians (n = 8) over a 4-month period in 2014.RESULTS: The results highlight that in the course of treatment, patients embrace or reject information on the basis of their previous experience, expectations, and confidence in their own ability. Overall, patients adjusting to everyday life after spinal fusion surgery used 4 strategies of information processing about their individual life situation. Patients do not use just one of these strategies but may use a number of strategies depending on the situation. Such production of knowledge is pivotal to the behavior of patients through their treatment trajectory.CONCLUSIONS: This study points to the challenges of supporting patients to assimilate information and affect health-related behaviors, recognizing that knowledge and behavior change are emergent processes in patients and not a linear outcome of information.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85056588505&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/NOR.0000000000000500

DO - 10.1097/NOR.0000000000000500

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 30451773

VL - 37

SP - 363

EP - 371

JO - Orthopaedic Nursing

JF - Orthopaedic Nursing

SN - 0744-6020

IS - 6

ER -