Do different parties respond to different problems? A comparative study of parliamentary questions across multiple countries

Shaun Bevan*, Enrico Borghetto, Henrik Seeberg

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journal/Conference contribution in journal/Contribution to newspaperJournal articleResearchpeer-review

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The identification of problem information is an important driver of political attention in parliament. This is widely acknowledged in the literature on party competition but there has been surprisingly little empirical research on the extent and when it matters. By relying on an extensive cross-country data set matching data on the policy content of parliamentary oral questions from ten European parliamentary democracies with well-established problem indicators (economy, immigration, and terrorism), this study sets out to answer these important questions. Our time series analysis reveals that not all problem indicators drive political attention in parliament to the same extent and that responsiveness varies based on differences in how government and opposition parties strategically take up problems as well as a partisan logic between left and right parties. While real world problem indicators can be a strong driver of parliamentary attention, that drive is still filtered through political and institutional processes.

Original languageEnglish
JournalJournal of European Public Policy
Volume31
Issue7
Pages (from-to)1856-1878
Number of pages23
ISSN1350-1763
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2023

Keywords

  • government and opposition
  • parliaments
  • political parties
  • problem status
  • Public policy
  • responsiveness

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Do different parties respond to different problems? A comparative study of parliamentary questions across multiple countries'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this