Digital Self-Defence: Why you Ought to Preserve Your Privacy for the Sake of Wrongdoers

Lauritz Aastrup Munch*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journal/Conference contribution in journal/Contribution to newspaperJournal articleResearchpeer-review

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Most studies on the ethics of privacy focus on what others ought to do to accommodate our interest in privacy. I focus on a related but distinct question that has attracted less attention in the literature: When, if ever, does morality require us to safeguard our own privacy? While we often have prudential reasons for safeguarding our privacy, we are also, at least sometimes, morally required to do so. I argue that we, sometimes, ought to safeguard our privacy for the sake of the possible wrongdoer, in order to prevent the possible wrongdoer from committing a morally defiling act that renders them worse off. I illustrate the variety of cases in which this duty binds us and contrast my view to some other claims in the literature which also purport to show that we sometimes have a duty to safeguard our own privacy.

Original languageEnglish
JournalEthical Theory and Moral Practice
Volume25
Issue2
Pages (from-to)233-248
Number of pages16
ISSN1386-2820
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Apr 2022

Keywords

  • Duty to protect privacy
  • Right to Privacy
  • Self-defense
  • Wrongdoing

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Digital Self-Defence: Why you Ought to Preserve Your Privacy for the Sake of Wrongdoers'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this