Dietary intake of total, heme and non-heme iron and the risk of colorectal cancer in a European prospective cohort study

Elom K Aglago, Amanda J Cross, Elio Riboli, Veronika Fedirko, David J Hughes, Agnes Fournier, Paula Jakszyn, Heinz Freisling, Marc J Gunter, Christina C Dahm, Kim Overvad, Anne Tjønneland, Cecilie Kyrø, Marie-Christine Boutron-Ruault, Joseph A Rothwell, Gianluca Severi, Verena Katzke, Bernard Srour, Matthias B Schulze, Clemens WittenbecherDomenico Palli, Sabina Sieri, Fabrizio Pasanisi, Rosario Tumino, Fulvio Ricceri, Bas Bueno-de-Mesquita, Jeroen W G Derksen, Guri Skeie, Torill Enget Jensen, Marko Lukic, Maria-Jose Sánchez, Pilar Amiano, Sandra Colorado-Yohar, Aurelio Barricarte, Ulrika Ericson, Bethany van Guelpen, Keren Papier, Anika Knuppel, Corinne Casagrande, Inge Huybrechts, Alicia K Heath, Konstantinos K Tsilidis, Mazda Jenab*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journal/Conference contribution in journal/Contribution to newspaperJournal articleResearchpeer-review

14 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Iron is an essential micronutrient with differing intake patterns and metabolism between men and women. Epidemiologic evidence on the association of dietary iron and its heme and non-heme components with colorectal cancer (CRC) development is inconclusive.

METHODS: We examined baseline dietary questionnaire-assessed intakes of total, heme, and non-heme iron and CRC risk in the EPIC cohort. Sex-specific multivariable-adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were computed using Cox regression. We modelled substitution of a 1 mg/day of heme iron intake with non-heme iron using the leave one-out method.

RESULTS: Of 450,105 participants (318,680 women) followed for 14.2 ± 4.0 years, 6162 (3511 women) developed CRC. In men, total iron intake was not associated with CRC risk (highest vs. lowest quintile, HR Q5vs.Q1:0.88; 95%CI:0.73, 1.06). An inverse association was observed for non-heme iron (HR Q5vs.Q1:0.80, 95%CI:0.67, 0.96) whereas heme iron showed a non-significant association (HR Q5vs.Q1:1.10; 95%CI:0.96, 1.27). In women, CRC risk was not associated with intakes of total (HR Q5vs.Q1:1.11, 95%CI:0.94, 1.31), heme (HR Q5vs.Q1:0.95; 95%CI:0.84, 1.07) or non-heme iron (HR Q5vs.Q1:1.03, 95%CI:0.88, 1.20). Substitution of heme with non-heme iron demonstrated lower CRC risk in men (HR:0.94; 95%CI: 0.89, 0.99).

CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest potential sex-specific CRC risk associations for higher iron consumption that may differ by dietary sources.

Original languageEnglish
JournalBritish Journal of Cancer
Volume128
Issue8
Pages (from-to)1529-1540
Number of pages12
ISSN0007-0920
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Apr 2023

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Dietary intake of total, heme and non-heme iron and the risk of colorectal cancer in a European prospective cohort study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this