Diagnosis and Detection of Sarcoidosis An Official American Thoracic Society Clinical Practice Guideline

Research output: Contribution to journal/Conference contribution in journal/Contribution to newspaperReviewResearchpeer-review

Standard

Diagnosis and Detection of Sarcoidosis An Official American Thoracic Society Clinical Practice Guideline. / Crouser, Elliott D.; Maier, Lisa A.; Baughman, Robert P.; Abston, Eric; Bernstein, Richard C.; Blankstein, Ron; Bonham, Catherine A.; Chen, Edward S.; Culver, Daniel A.; Drake, Wonder; Drent, Marjolein; Gerke, Alicia K.; Ghobrial, Michael; Govender, Praveen; Hamzeh, Nabeel; James, W. Ennis; Judson, Marc A.; Kellermeyer, Liz; Knight, Shandra; Koth, Laura L.; Morgenthau, Adam S.; Patterson, Karen C.; Poletti, Venerino; Raman, Subha V.; Tukey, Melissa H.; Westney, Gloria E.; Wilson, Kevin C.

In: American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Vol. 201, No. 8, 04.2020, p. E26-E51.

Research output: Contribution to journal/Conference contribution in journal/Contribution to newspaperReviewResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Crouser, ED, Maier, LA, Baughman, RP, Abston, E, Bernstein, RC, Blankstein, R, Bonham, CA, Chen, ES, Culver, DA, Drake, W, Drent, M, Gerke, AK, Ghobrial, M, Govender, P, Hamzeh, N, James, WE, Judson, MA, Kellermeyer, L, Knight, S, Koth, LL, Morgenthau, AS, Patterson, KC, Poletti, V, Raman, SV, Tukey, MH, Westney, GE & Wilson, KC 2020, 'Diagnosis and Detection of Sarcoidosis An Official American Thoracic Society Clinical Practice Guideline', American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, vol. 201, no. 8, pp. E26-E51. https://doi.org/10.1164/RCCM.202002-0251ST

APA

Crouser, E. D., Maier, L. A., Baughman, R. P., Abston, E., Bernstein, R. C., Blankstein, R., Bonham, C. A., Chen, E. S., Culver, D. A., Drake, W., Drent, M., Gerke, A. K., Ghobrial, M., Govender, P., Hamzeh, N., James, W. E., Judson, M. A., Kellermeyer, L., Knight, S., ... Wilson, K. C. (2020). Diagnosis and Detection of Sarcoidosis An Official American Thoracic Society Clinical Practice Guideline. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, 201(8), E26-E51. https://doi.org/10.1164/RCCM.202002-0251ST

CBE

Crouser ED, Maier LA, Baughman RP, Abston E, Bernstein RC, Blankstein R, Bonham CA, Chen ES, Culver DA, Drake W, Drent M, Gerke AK, Ghobrial M, Govender P, Hamzeh N, James WE, Judson MA, Kellermeyer L, Knight S, Koth LL, Morgenthau AS, Patterson KC, Poletti V, Raman SV, Tukey MH, Westney GE, Wilson KC. 2020. Diagnosis and Detection of Sarcoidosis An Official American Thoracic Society Clinical Practice Guideline. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine. 201(8):E26-E51. https://doi.org/10.1164/RCCM.202002-0251ST

MLA

Crouser, Elliott D. et al. "Diagnosis and Detection of Sarcoidosis An Official American Thoracic Society Clinical Practice Guideline". American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine. 2020, 201(8). E26-E51. https://doi.org/10.1164/RCCM.202002-0251ST

Vancouver

Crouser ED, Maier LA, Baughman RP, Abston E, Bernstein RC, Blankstein R et al. Diagnosis and Detection of Sarcoidosis An Official American Thoracic Society Clinical Practice Guideline. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine. 2020 Apr;201(8):E26-E51. https://doi.org/10.1164/RCCM.202002-0251ST

Author

Crouser, Elliott D. ; Maier, Lisa A. ; Baughman, Robert P. ; Abston, Eric ; Bernstein, Richard C. ; Blankstein, Ron ; Bonham, Catherine A. ; Chen, Edward S. ; Culver, Daniel A. ; Drake, Wonder ; Drent, Marjolein ; Gerke, Alicia K. ; Ghobrial, Michael ; Govender, Praveen ; Hamzeh, Nabeel ; James, W. Ennis ; Judson, Marc A. ; Kellermeyer, Liz ; Knight, Shandra ; Koth, Laura L. ; Morgenthau, Adam S. ; Patterson, Karen C. ; Poletti, Venerino ; Raman, Subha V. ; Tukey, Melissa H. ; Westney, Gloria E. ; Wilson, Kevin C. / Diagnosis and Detection of Sarcoidosis An Official American Thoracic Society Clinical Practice Guideline. In: American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine. 2020 ; Vol. 201, No. 8. pp. E26-E51.

Bibtex

@article{19563a8d04094f0fa30a56b18ab0435e,
title = "Diagnosis and Detection of Sarcoidosis An Official American Thoracic Society Clinical Practice Guideline",
abstract = "Background: The diagnosis of sarcoidosis is not standardized but is based on three major criteria: a compatible clinical presentation, finding nonnecrotizing granulomatous inflammation in one or more tissue samples, and the exclusion of alternative causes of granulomatous disease. There are no universally accepted measures to determine if each diagnostic criterion has been satisfied; therefore, the diagnosis of sarcoidosis is never fully secure. Methods: Systematic reviews and, when appropriate, meta-analyses were performed to summarize the best available evidence. The evidence was appraised using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach and then discussed by a multidisciplinary panel. Recommendations for or against various diagnostic tests were formulated and graded after the expert panel weighed desirable and undesirable consequences, certainty of estimates, feasibility, and acceptability. Results: The clinical presentation, histopathology, and exclusion of alternative diagnoses were summarized. On the basis of the available evidence, the expert committee made 1 strong recommendation for baseline serum calcium testing, 13 conditional recommendations, and 1 best practice statement. All evidence was very low quality. Conclusions: The panel used systematic reviews of the evidence to inform clinical recommendations in favor of or against various diagnostic tests in patients with suspected or known sarcoidosis. The evidence and recommendations should be revisited as new evidence becomes available.",
keywords = "Cardiac sarcoidosis, Endobronchial ultrasound biopsy, Granuloma, Pulmonary hypertension, Rare lung disease",
author = "Crouser, {Elliott D.} and Maier, {Lisa A.} and Baughman, {Robert P.} and Eric Abston and Bernstein, {Richard C.} and Ron Blankstein and Bonham, {Catherine A.} and Chen, {Edward S.} and Culver, {Daniel A.} and Wonder Drake and Marjolein Drent and Gerke, {Alicia K.} and Michael Ghobrial and Praveen Govender and Nabeel Hamzeh and James, {W. Ennis} and Judson, {Marc A.} and Liz Kellermeyer and Shandra Knight and Koth, {Laura L.} and Morgenthau, {Adam S.} and Patterson, {Karen C.} and Venerino Poletti and Raman, {Subha V.} and Tukey, {Melissa H.} and Westney, {Gloria E.} and Wilson, {Kevin C.}",
year = "2020",
month = apr,
doi = "10.1164/RCCM.202002-0251ST",
language = "English",
volume = "201",
pages = "E26--E51",
journal = "American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine",
issn = "1073-449X",
publisher = "American Thoracic Society",
number = "8",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Diagnosis and Detection of Sarcoidosis An Official American Thoracic Society Clinical Practice Guideline

AU - Crouser, Elliott D.

AU - Maier, Lisa A.

AU - Baughman, Robert P.

AU - Abston, Eric

AU - Bernstein, Richard C.

AU - Blankstein, Ron

AU - Bonham, Catherine A.

AU - Chen, Edward S.

AU - Culver, Daniel A.

AU - Drake, Wonder

AU - Drent, Marjolein

AU - Gerke, Alicia K.

AU - Ghobrial, Michael

AU - Govender, Praveen

AU - Hamzeh, Nabeel

AU - James, W. Ennis

AU - Judson, Marc A.

AU - Kellermeyer, Liz

AU - Knight, Shandra

AU - Koth, Laura L.

AU - Morgenthau, Adam S.

AU - Patterson, Karen C.

AU - Poletti, Venerino

AU - Raman, Subha V.

AU - Tukey, Melissa H.

AU - Westney, Gloria E.

AU - Wilson, Kevin C.

PY - 2020/4

Y1 - 2020/4

N2 - Background: The diagnosis of sarcoidosis is not standardized but is based on three major criteria: a compatible clinical presentation, finding nonnecrotizing granulomatous inflammation in one or more tissue samples, and the exclusion of alternative causes of granulomatous disease. There are no universally accepted measures to determine if each diagnostic criterion has been satisfied; therefore, the diagnosis of sarcoidosis is never fully secure. Methods: Systematic reviews and, when appropriate, meta-analyses were performed to summarize the best available evidence. The evidence was appraised using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach and then discussed by a multidisciplinary panel. Recommendations for or against various diagnostic tests were formulated and graded after the expert panel weighed desirable and undesirable consequences, certainty of estimates, feasibility, and acceptability. Results: The clinical presentation, histopathology, and exclusion of alternative diagnoses were summarized. On the basis of the available evidence, the expert committee made 1 strong recommendation for baseline serum calcium testing, 13 conditional recommendations, and 1 best practice statement. All evidence was very low quality. Conclusions: The panel used systematic reviews of the evidence to inform clinical recommendations in favor of or against various diagnostic tests in patients with suspected or known sarcoidosis. The evidence and recommendations should be revisited as new evidence becomes available.

AB - Background: The diagnosis of sarcoidosis is not standardized but is based on three major criteria: a compatible clinical presentation, finding nonnecrotizing granulomatous inflammation in one or more tissue samples, and the exclusion of alternative causes of granulomatous disease. There are no universally accepted measures to determine if each diagnostic criterion has been satisfied; therefore, the diagnosis of sarcoidosis is never fully secure. Methods: Systematic reviews and, when appropriate, meta-analyses were performed to summarize the best available evidence. The evidence was appraised using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach and then discussed by a multidisciplinary panel. Recommendations for or against various diagnostic tests were formulated and graded after the expert panel weighed desirable and undesirable consequences, certainty of estimates, feasibility, and acceptability. Results: The clinical presentation, histopathology, and exclusion of alternative diagnoses were summarized. On the basis of the available evidence, the expert committee made 1 strong recommendation for baseline serum calcium testing, 13 conditional recommendations, and 1 best practice statement. All evidence was very low quality. Conclusions: The panel used systematic reviews of the evidence to inform clinical recommendations in favor of or against various diagnostic tests in patients with suspected or known sarcoidosis. The evidence and recommendations should be revisited as new evidence becomes available.

KW - Cardiac sarcoidosis

KW - Endobronchial ultrasound biopsy

KW - Granuloma

KW - Pulmonary hypertension

KW - Rare lung disease

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85083404661&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1164/RCCM.202002-0251ST

DO - 10.1164/RCCM.202002-0251ST

M3 - Review

C2 - 32293205

AN - SCOPUS:85083404661

VL - 201

SP - E26-E51

JO - American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine

JF - American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine

SN - 1073-449X

IS - 8

ER -