Developing versus developed companies in Business Excellence initiatives

Rafal Haffer, Kai Kristensen

Research output: Contribution to journal/Conference contribution in journal/Contribution to newspaperJournal articleResearchpeer-review

17 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The paper reports the advance of Polish companies in Business Excellence initiatives. It indicates how these activities influence their performance. EFQM Excellence Model indicators are used as the evaluation criteria for the study. The performance variable is introduced to ensure the calculation of correlations between EFQM model indicators and performance results. The data are next estimated as a structural equation model by partial least squares using SmartPLS software (Ringle et al., 2005). That estimation is conducted on the model of the Danish Business Excellence Index methodology (Kristensen et al., 2001a). The correlations and estimation results are used to discuss the condition of Polish companies and to point out the efforts that should be made for further development. Information about actual financial results for the companies is introduced and the paper discusses the possibility of using results from the Business Excellence Model as a proxy for actual financial results in Poland. Data and results from a similar study done in Denmark are also described; thus, a comparison between developing Polish companies and developed Danish ones is included. Poland and Denmark are used as cases of, respectively, developing and developed European countries.
Original languageEnglish
JournalTotal Quality Management & Business Excellence (Print Edition)
Volume19
Issue7-8
Pages (from-to)763-775
Number of pages13
ISSN1478-3363
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2008

Keywords

  • Poland
  • Denmark
  • EFQM Excellence Model
  • Danish Business Excellence Model
  • Companies' efforts in developing business excellence

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Developing versus developed companies in Business Excellence initiatives'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this