Developing quality indicators for physician-staffed emergency medical services: A consensus process

Helge Haugland*, Marius Rehn, Pål Klepstad, Andreas Krüger, EQUIPE-collaboration group

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journal/Conference contribution in journal/Contribution to newspaperJournal articleResearchpeer-review

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: There is increasing interest for quality measurement in health care services; pre-hospital emergency medical services (EMS) included. However, attempts of measuring the quality of physician-staffed EMS (P-EMS) are scarce. The aim of this study was to develop a set of quality indicators for international P-EMS to allow quality improvement initiatives. Methods: A four-step modified nominal group technique process (expert panel method) was used. Results: The expert panel reached consensus on 26 quality indicators for P-EMS. Fifteen quality indicators measure quality of P-EMS responses (response-specific quality indicators), whereas eleven quality indicators measure quality of P-EMS system structures (system-specific quality indicators). Discussion: When measuring quality, the six quality dimensions defined by The Institute of Medicine should be appraised. We argue that this multidimensional approach to quality measurement seems particularly reasonable for services with a highly heterogenic patient population and complex operational contexts, like P-EMS. The quality indicators in this study were developed to represent a broad and comprehensive approach to quality measurement of P-EMS. Conclusions: The expert panel successfully developed a set of quality indicators for international P-EMS. The quality indicators should be prospectively tested for feasibility, validity and reliability in clinical datasets. The quality indicators should then allow for adjusted quality measurement across different P-EMS systems.

Original languageEnglish
Article number14
JournalScandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine
Volume25
Issue1
Number of pages8
ISSN1757-7241
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 15 Feb 2017

Keywords

  • Modified nominal group technique
  • Physician-staffed emergency medical services
  • Quality indicators
  • PREHOSPITAL CRITICAL-CARE
  • MANAGEMENT
  • IMPROVEMENT
  • PRIORITIES
  • SYSTEMS
  • PATIENT
  • FUTURE
  • CHALLENGES
  • TRAUMA
  • Physicians
  • Quality Indicators, Health Care
  • Consensus
  • Personnel Staffing and Scheduling
  • Delphi Technique
  • Quality Improvement
  • Emergency Medical Services/standards

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Developing quality indicators for physician-staffed emergency medical services: A consensus process'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this