Dark, gray, or bright creativity? (Re)investigating the link between creativity and dishonesty

Karolina A. Ścigała*, Christoph Schild, Ingo Zettler

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journal/Conference contribution in journal/Contribution to newspaperJournal articleResearchpeer-review

13 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The question of whether and, if so, how creativity and unethical behavior such as dishonesty are related to each other has been addressed in multiple studies, with mixed results overall. The aim of this Registered Report is to shed further light on this issue. We first present a meta-analysis on the relation between creativity and dishonesty comprising the samples from a pre-registered multi-lab study (on a different topic), which indicated no relation between the constructs in question (k = 19, N = 2,154, rp =.02). Next, we examined the relation between creativity and dishonesty in a study (N = 1,152), in which we addressed several limitations of previous research. Specifically, we examined relations between comprehensively assessed creativity and dishonesty using subjective and objective indicators for both constructs. We found mixed results concerning the relation between creativity and dishonesty. In the majority of the confirmatory statistical tests, subjective creativity was positively related, whereas objective creativity was negatively related to dishonesty in the mind game. However, in exploratory analyses, we found that neither subjective nor objective creativity was related to dishonesty in the second dishonesty measure, the sender–receiver game.

Original languageEnglish
JournalEuropean Journal of Personality
Volume36
Issue1
Pages (from-to)108-129
Number of pages22
ISSN0890-2070
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2022

Keywords

  • creativity
  • dishonesty
  • unethical behavior
  • HEXACO

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Dark, gray, or bright creativity? (Re)investigating the link between creativity and dishonesty'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this