Danish citizens' perspectives on the preventive medication recommended after screen-detected cardiovascular disease: A qualitative study

Helen Gräs Højgaard*, Kirsten Frederiksen, Annete Langager Høgh, Bodil Rasmussen, Marie Dahl

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journal/Conference contribution in journal/Contribution to newspaperJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Background: The rationale for screening for cardiovascular disease (CVD) is debated as a prevention strategy. However, research shows that when preventive medication is initiated after screening for CVD, mortality rates decrease, especially among men. When implementing screening programmes, facilitating citizens' informed decisions and empowering their autonomy in the decision-making process are crucial. We therefore aimed to explore citizens' perspectives on and decisions regarding initiating cardiovascular preventive medication for screen-detected CVD. Methods: We employed an exploratory qualitative design using semi-structured interviews to investigate participants' perspectives on and decisions regarding initiating cardiovascular preventive medication for screen-detected CVD. Twelve interviews were conducted and analysed using thematic analysis following Braun and Clarke's six-step approach. Findings: We found one overall theme, Being on a continuum between wellness and illness, with two underlying sub-themes. Sub-theme (1) Navigating mixed feelings and pathways reflects participants' perspectives on CVD preventive medication, which were positioned on a continuum with shifting perspectives. The state between wellness and illness was experienced as liminal and characterised by uncertainty and concerns about CVD risk. (2) Navigating medication decisions: a negotiated process. Pivotal medical decisions hinged on trust in authorities or own judgement, influenced by attitudes towards the need for medication, perception of meaningfulness, asymptomatic condition, age, family responsibility and predisposition. Participants' medical decisions were supported and impacted by significant others. Conclusion: We uncovered a continuum of shifting perspectives ranging from feeling improved health to experiencing fear of CVD. For certain citizens, it is like navigating between these contrasting feelings. The perceived necessity and meaningfulness, in particular, shape medical decisions. Providing support for informed decisions is crucial and includes significant others. Shared decision-making with healthcare professionals as facilitators is needed. Future research is warranted to investigate how to embrace the various perspectives on initiating CVD preventive medication in clinical practice.

Original languageEnglish
JournalScandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences
Volume38
Issue3
Pages (from-to)802-814
Number of pages13
ISSN0283-9318
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sept 2024

Keywords

  • cardiovascular disease
  • decision making
  • early interventiong
  • medication adherence
  • prevention
  • qualitative study
  • screening

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Danish citizens' perspectives on the preventive medication recommended after screen-detected cardiovascular disease: A qualitative study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this