Crisis? What Crisis? Measuring Economic Crisis in Political Science

Research output: Contribution to journal/Conference contribution in journal/Contribution to newspaperJournal articleResearchpeer-review

5 Citations (Scopus)
158 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

An influential body of scholarship in political science has investigated the impact of economic crisis on various political outcomes. The vast majority of these studies rely on annual growth rates (AGR) to specify economic crisis. I argue that this canonical approach comes with several logical shortcomings. It leads to misguided impressions of crisis severity; it makes no distinction between rapid expansion years and rapid recovery years; and it disregards the financial dimension of economic crises. I present and discuss three alternative approaches of measuring economic crisis, imported from economics: economic shocks, economic slumps, and measures of financial crises. Examples from the regime instability literature demonstrate that these alternative crisis measurements provide results that are theoretically more nuanced and empirically more robust. On this basis, the article encourages researchers to pay more attention to the way they measure economic crisis in general and to supplement the AGR approach with alternative crisis measures in particular.

Original languageEnglish
JournalQuality and Quantity
Volume53
Issue3
Pages (from-to)1479-1493
Number of pages15
ISSN0033-5177
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2019

Keywords

  • Annual growth rates
  • Economic crisis
  • Measurement

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Crisis? What Crisis? Measuring Economic Crisis in Political Science'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this