Could Danish foundations’ reliance on reporting platforms cause clashes with researchers over how to register impact?

Duncan Andrew Thomas

Could Danish foundations’ reliance on reporting platforms cause clashes with researchers over how to register impact?

Duncan Andrew Thomas

Department of Political Science - Danish Centre for Studies in Research and Research Policy

Research output: Contribution to journal/Conference contribution in journal/Contribution to newspaper › Contribution to newspaper - Feature article

Abstract

A recent British scandal demonstrates the problematic nature of research project reporting. Duncan Thomas takes a look at how to handle potential tensions and contradictions around impact of funded research.

Original language	English
Journal	Forskningspolitikk
Volume	2022
Issue	3
Pages (from-to)	26-27
Number of pages	2
ISSN	0333-0273
Publication status	Published - 19 Oct 2022

Access to Document

https://www.fpol.no/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/Forskningspolitikk_3_2022-2.pdfLicence: Unspecified

Cite this

@article{3e705ac16e064575bf738537c413cffd,

title = "Could Danish foundations{\textquoteright} reliance on reporting platforms cause clashes with researchers over how to register impact?",

abstract = "A recent British scandal demonstrates the problematic nature of research project reporting. Duncan Thomas takes a look at how to handle potential tensions and contradictions around impact of funded research.",

author = "Thomas, {Duncan Andrew}",

year = "2022",

month = oct,

day = "19",

language = "English",

volume = "2022",

pages = "26--27",

journal = "Forskningspolitikk",

issn = "0333-0273",

publisher = "nifu (nordisk institutt for studier av innovasjon forskning og utdanning)",