Correction to: Citation concept analysis (CCA): a new form of citation analysis revealing the usefulness of concepts for other researchers illustrated by exemplary case studies including classic books by Thomas S. Kuhn and Karl R. Popper (Scientometrics, (2020), 122, 2, (1051-1074), 10.1007/s11192-019-03326-2)

TY - JOUR

T1 - Correction to

T2 - Citation concept analysis (CCA): a new form of citation analysis revealing the usefulness of concepts for other researchers illustrated by exemplary case studies including classic books by Thomas S. Kuhn and Karl R. Popper (Scientometrics, (2020), 122, 2, (1051-1074), 10.1007/s11192-019-03326-2)

AU - Bornmann, Lutz

AU - Wray, K. Brad

AU - Haunschild, Robin

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2020, The Author(s).

PY - 2020/9/1

Y1 - 2020/9/1

N2 - In Bornmann, Wray, and Haunschild (2020, p. 1059), the term “like” was inadvertently included in the list of uncertainty terms. We did not use the term “like” for detection of uncertainty, and we did not intend to do so. The correct sentence should read: ‘The final set is as follows: “may”, “could”, “questions”, “might”, “potential”, “seems”, “perhaps”, “likely”, and “sometimes”.’ We apologize for any confusion this mistake might have caused.

AB - In Bornmann, Wray, and Haunschild (2020, p. 1059), the term “like” was inadvertently included in the list of uncertainty terms. We did not use the term “like” for detection of uncertainty, and we did not intend to do so. The correct sentence should read: ‘The final set is as follows: “may”, “could”, “questions”, “might”, “potential”, “seems”, “perhaps”, “likely”, and “sometimes”.’ We apologize for any confusion this mistake might have caused.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85084559925&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s11192-020-03495-5

DO - 10.1007/s11192-020-03495-5

M3 - Comment/debate/letter to the editor

AN - SCOPUS:85084559925

SN - 0138-9130

VL - 124

SP - 2737

JO - Scientometrics

JF - Scientometrics

IS - 3

ER -