Contrasting responses of multiple insect taxa to common heathland management regimes and old-growth successional stages

David Bille Byriel; Hjalte Ro-Poulsen; Sebastian Kepfer-Rojas; Aslak Kappel Hansen; Rikke Reisner Hansen; Mathias Just Justesen; Emil Kristensen; Cecilie Bülow Møller; Inger Kappel Schmidt

doi:10.1007/s10531-022-02511-9

Contrasting responses of multiple insect taxa to common heathland management regimes and old-growth successional stages

David Bille Byriel^*, Hjalte Ro-Poulsen, Sebastian Kepfer-Rojas, Aslak Kappel Hansen, Rikke Reisner Hansen, Mathias Just Justesen, Emil Kristensen, Cecilie Bülow Møller, Inger Kappel Schmidt

^*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journal/Conference contribution in journal/Contribution to newspaper › Journal article › Research › peer-review

6 Citations (Scopus)

4 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Maintaining heathlands in early successional stages to sustain heather (Calluna vulgaris) is a common, large-scale management practice in Europe. However, allowing patches of long-term natural vegetation development may increase habitat heterogeneity benefitting insects, but empirical evidence is sparse. We investigated how old-growth heathland (> 30 years abandonment) affect species richness and composition of bees (Anthophila), crane flies (Tipuloidea), ground beetles (Carabidae), hoverflies (Syrphidae) and rove beetles (Staphylinidae) in relation to their hygropreference. Adult insects, vegetation and edaphic explanatory variables were collected in old-growth, managed and wet sites and compared in four lowland heathland locations in Denmark. We found 299 species including 24 nationally red-listed. Species composition differed between managed, old-growth and wet heathland for all taxa. Indicator species and richness analyses showed a predominance of xerophilic bee species in managed heathland. Old-growth heathland showed a predominance of mesophilic indicator species, and higher richness of mesophilic crane flies and of hygrophilic ground and rove beetles compared to managed heathland. Wet heathland was generally dominated by hygrophilic species. Soil moisture, bare soil and vegetation height density were important drivers explaining the contrasting responses in richness and composition between heathland types. Our results demonstrate that heathland management focusing solely on early successional vegetation stages may homogenize insect communities. We suggest that management practices should focus on improving structural vegetation heterogeneity. This can be achieved through management regimes that reset the succession and expose bare soil, but also by allowing patches of old-growth vegetation stages to develop and by conserving existing ones.

Original language	English
Journal	Biodiversity and Conservation
Volume	32
Issue	2
Pages (from-to)	545-565
Number of pages	21
ISSN	0960-3115
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-022-02511-9
Publication status	Published - Jan 2023

Keywords

Arthropods
Biodiversity
Conservation management
Diversity
Insects
Lowland heathland
Multi-taxa
Old-growth
Species composition

Access to Document

10.1007/s10531-022-02511-9Licence: CC BY

s10531-022-02511-9Final published version, 2.35 MBLicence: CC BY

Cite this

@article{bc686553d4a143e28ac1c95c5dbea5a0,

title = "Contrasting responses of multiple insect taxa to common heathland management regimes and old-growth successional stages",

abstract = "Maintaining heathlands in early successional stages to sustain heather (Calluna vulgaris) is a common, large-scale management practice in Europe. However, allowing patches of long-term natural vegetation development may increase habitat heterogeneity benefitting insects, but empirical evidence is sparse. We investigated how old-growth heathland (> 30 years abandonment) affect species richness and composition of bees (Anthophila), crane flies (Tipuloidea), ground beetles (Carabidae), hoverflies (Syrphidae) and rove beetles (Staphylinidae) in relation to their hygropreference. Adult insects, vegetation and edaphic explanatory variables were collected in old-growth, managed and wet sites and compared in four lowland heathland locations in Denmark. We found 299 species including 24 nationally red-listed. Species composition differed between managed, old-growth and wet heathland for all taxa. Indicator species and richness analyses showed a predominance of xerophilic bee species in managed heathland. Old-growth heathland showed a predominance of mesophilic indicator species, and higher richness of mesophilic crane flies and of hygrophilic ground and rove beetles compared to managed heathland. Wet heathland was generally dominated by hygrophilic species. Soil moisture, bare soil and vegetation height density were important drivers explaining the contrasting responses in richness and composition between heathland types. Our results demonstrate that heathland management focusing solely on early successional vegetation stages may homogenize insect communities. We suggest that management practices should focus on improving structural vegetation heterogeneity. This can be achieved through management regimes that reset the succession and expose bare soil, but also by allowing patches of old-growth vegetation stages to develop and by conserving existing ones.",

keywords = "Arthropods, Biodiversity, Conservation management, Diversity, Insects, Lowland heathland, Multi-taxa, Old-growth, Species composition",

author = "Byriel, {David Bille} and Hjalte Ro-Poulsen and Sebastian Kepfer-Rojas and Hansen, {Aslak Kappel} and Hansen, {Rikke Reisner} and Justesen, {Mathias Just} and Emil Kristensen and M{\o}ller, {Cecilie B{\"u}low} and Schmidt, {Inger Kappel}",

year = "2023",

month = jan,

doi = "10.1007/s10531-022-02511-9",

language = "English",

volume = "32",

pages = "545--565",

journal = "Biodiversity and Conservation",

issn = "0960-3115",

publisher = "Springer",

number = "2",

}

Contrasting responses of multiple insect taxa to common heathland management regimes and old-growth successional stages. / Byriel, David Bille; Ro-Poulsen, Hjalte; Kepfer-Rojas, Sebastian et al.
In: Biodiversity and Conservation, Vol. 32, No. 2, 01.2023, p. 545-565.

Research output: Contribution to journal/Conference contribution in journal/Contribution to newspaper › Journal article › Research › peer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Contrasting responses of multiple insect taxa to common heathland management regimes and old-growth successional stages

AU - Byriel, David Bille

AU - Ro-Poulsen, Hjalte

AU - Kepfer-Rojas, Sebastian

AU - Hansen, Aslak Kappel

AU - Hansen, Rikke Reisner

AU - Justesen, Mathias Just

AU - Kristensen, Emil

AU - Møller, Cecilie Bülow

AU - Schmidt, Inger Kappel

PY - 2023/1

Y1 - 2023/1

N2 - Maintaining heathlands in early successional stages to sustain heather (Calluna vulgaris) is a common, large-scale management practice in Europe. However, allowing patches of long-term natural vegetation development may increase habitat heterogeneity benefitting insects, but empirical evidence is sparse. We investigated how old-growth heathland (> 30 years abandonment) affect species richness and composition of bees (Anthophila), crane flies (Tipuloidea), ground beetles (Carabidae), hoverflies (Syrphidae) and rove beetles (Staphylinidae) in relation to their hygropreference. Adult insects, vegetation and edaphic explanatory variables were collected in old-growth, managed and wet sites and compared in four lowland heathland locations in Denmark. We found 299 species including 24 nationally red-listed. Species composition differed between managed, old-growth and wet heathland for all taxa. Indicator species and richness analyses showed a predominance of xerophilic bee species in managed heathland. Old-growth heathland showed a predominance of mesophilic indicator species, and higher richness of mesophilic crane flies and of hygrophilic ground and rove beetles compared to managed heathland. Wet heathland was generally dominated by hygrophilic species. Soil moisture, bare soil and vegetation height density were important drivers explaining the contrasting responses in richness and composition between heathland types. Our results demonstrate that heathland management focusing solely on early successional vegetation stages may homogenize insect communities. We suggest that management practices should focus on improving structural vegetation heterogeneity. This can be achieved through management regimes that reset the succession and expose bare soil, but also by allowing patches of old-growth vegetation stages to develop and by conserving existing ones.

AB - Maintaining heathlands in early successional stages to sustain heather (Calluna vulgaris) is a common, large-scale management practice in Europe. However, allowing patches of long-term natural vegetation development may increase habitat heterogeneity benefitting insects, but empirical evidence is sparse. We investigated how old-growth heathland (> 30 years abandonment) affect species richness and composition of bees (Anthophila), crane flies (Tipuloidea), ground beetles (Carabidae), hoverflies (Syrphidae) and rove beetles (Staphylinidae) in relation to their hygropreference. Adult insects, vegetation and edaphic explanatory variables were collected in old-growth, managed and wet sites and compared in four lowland heathland locations in Denmark. We found 299 species including 24 nationally red-listed. Species composition differed between managed, old-growth and wet heathland for all taxa. Indicator species and richness analyses showed a predominance of xerophilic bee species in managed heathland. Old-growth heathland showed a predominance of mesophilic indicator species, and higher richness of mesophilic crane flies and of hygrophilic ground and rove beetles compared to managed heathland. Wet heathland was generally dominated by hygrophilic species. Soil moisture, bare soil and vegetation height density were important drivers explaining the contrasting responses in richness and composition between heathland types. Our results demonstrate that heathland management focusing solely on early successional vegetation stages may homogenize insect communities. We suggest that management practices should focus on improving structural vegetation heterogeneity. This can be achieved through management regimes that reset the succession and expose bare soil, but also by allowing patches of old-growth vegetation stages to develop and by conserving existing ones.

KW - Arthropods

KW - Biodiversity

KW - Conservation management

KW - Diversity

KW - Insects

KW - Lowland heathland

KW - Multi-taxa

KW - Old-growth

KW - Species composition

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85143159244&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s10531-022-02511-9

DO - 10.1007/s10531-022-02511-9

M3 - Journal article

AN - SCOPUS:85143159244

SN - 0960-3115

VL - 32

SP - 545

EP - 565

JO - Biodiversity and Conservation

JF - Biodiversity and Conservation

IS - 2

ER -

Contrasting responses of multiple insect taxa to common heathland management regimes and old-growth successional stages

Abstract

Keywords

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this