Contention and social order: The historical relation between political and social riot dispositives

Johan Gøtzsche-Astrup*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journal/Conference contribution in journal/Contribution to newspaperJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

The relation between political contention and social order is a fundamental field of sociological inquiry. This article puts forward a dispositive perspective on the relation by analysing its constitution in concrete objects of control. Focusing on the object of riots, I uncover a significant change at the turn of the nineteenth century. Before the change, political and social riot dispositives were both mutually exclusive and in danger of transforming into each other. This meant that riots were sites in which the relation between contention and social order was negotiated. This negotiation was brought to a halt by a new relation. Consequently, political and social riot dispositives could coexist on the condition that riots became a liminal object. This article contributes to our empirical knowledge on the link between political and social dispositives and opens up a new perspective on the general relation between contention and social order.

Original languageEnglish
JournalEuropean Journal of Cultural and Political Sociology
Volume10
Issue2
Pages (from-to)258-278
Number of pages21
ISSN2325-4823
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2023

Keywords

  • Contention
  • dispositives
  • Foucault
  • riots
  • social order

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Contention and social order: The historical relation between political and social riot dispositives'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this