Research output: Contribution to journal/Conference contribution in journal/Contribution to newspaper › Review › Research › peer-review
Consonance and dissonance perception : A critical review of the historical sources, multidisciplinary findings, and main hypotheses. / Di Stefano, Nicola; Vuust, Peter; Brattico, Elvira.
In: Physics of Life Reviews, Vol. 43, 12.2022, p. 273-304.Research output: Contribution to journal/Conference contribution in journal/Contribution to newspaper › Review › Research › peer-review
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Consonance and dissonance perception
T2 - A critical review of the historical sources, multidisciplinary findings, and main hypotheses
AU - Di Stefano, Nicola
AU - Vuust, Peter
AU - Brattico, Elvira
N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2022 Elsevier B.V.
PY - 2022/12
Y1 - 2022/12
N2 - Revealed more than two millennia ago by Pythagoras, consonance and dissonance (C/D) are foundational concepts in music theory, perception, and aesthetics. The search for the biological, acoustical, and cultural factors that affect C/D perception has resulted in descriptive accounts inspired by arithmetic, musicological, psychoacoustical or neurobiological frameworks without reaching a consensus. Here, we review the key historical sources and modern multidisciplinary findings on C/D and integrate them into three main hypotheses: the vocal similarity hypothesis (VSH), the psychocultural hypothesis (PH), and the sensorimotor hypothesis (SH). By illustrating the hypotheses-related findings, we highlight their major conceptual, methodological, and terminological shortcomings. Trying to provide a unitary framework for C/D understanding, we put together multidisciplinary research on human and animal vocalizations, which converges to suggest that auditory roughness is associated with distress/danger and, therefore, elicits defensive behavioral reactions and neural responses that indicate aversion. We therefore stress the primacy of vocality and roughness as key factors in the explanation of C/D phenomenon, and we explore the (neuro)biological underpinnings of the attraction-aversion mechanisms that are triggered by C/D stimuli. Based on the reviewed evidence, while the aversive nature of dissonance appears as solidly rooted in the multidisciplinary findings, the attractive nature of consonance remains a somewhat speculative claim that needs further investigation. Finally, we outline future directions for empirical research in C/D, especially regarding cross-modal and cross-cultural approaches.
AB - Revealed more than two millennia ago by Pythagoras, consonance and dissonance (C/D) are foundational concepts in music theory, perception, and aesthetics. The search for the biological, acoustical, and cultural factors that affect C/D perception has resulted in descriptive accounts inspired by arithmetic, musicological, psychoacoustical or neurobiological frameworks without reaching a consensus. Here, we review the key historical sources and modern multidisciplinary findings on C/D and integrate them into three main hypotheses: the vocal similarity hypothesis (VSH), the psychocultural hypothesis (PH), and the sensorimotor hypothesis (SH). By illustrating the hypotheses-related findings, we highlight their major conceptual, methodological, and terminological shortcomings. Trying to provide a unitary framework for C/D understanding, we put together multidisciplinary research on human and animal vocalizations, which converges to suggest that auditory roughness is associated with distress/danger and, therefore, elicits defensive behavioral reactions and neural responses that indicate aversion. We therefore stress the primacy of vocality and roughness as key factors in the explanation of C/D phenomenon, and we explore the (neuro)biological underpinnings of the attraction-aversion mechanisms that are triggered by C/D stimuli. Based on the reviewed evidence, while the aversive nature of dissonance appears as solidly rooted in the multidisciplinary findings, the attractive nature of consonance remains a somewhat speculative claim that needs further investigation. Finally, we outline future directions for empirical research in C/D, especially regarding cross-modal and cross-cultural approaches.
KW - Auditory roughness
KW - Harmony
KW - Musical intervals
KW - Processing fluency
KW - Vocal similarity hypothesis
KW - Vocality
U2 - 10.1016/j.plrev.2022.10.004
DO - 10.1016/j.plrev.2022.10.004
M3 - Review
C2 - 36372030
AN - SCOPUS:85141484275
VL - 43
SP - 273
EP - 304
JO - Physics of Life Reviews
JF - Physics of Life Reviews
SN - 1571-0645
ER -