Aarhus University Seal

Consonance and dissonance perception: A critical review of the historical sources, multidisciplinary findings, and main hypotheses

Research output: Contribution to journal/Conference contribution in journal/Contribution to newspaperReviewResearchpeer-review

Standard

Consonance and dissonance perception : A critical review of the historical sources, multidisciplinary findings, and main hypotheses. / Di Stefano, Nicola; Vuust, Peter; Brattico, Elvira.

In: Physics of Life Reviews, Vol. 43, 12.2022, p. 273-304.

Research output: Contribution to journal/Conference contribution in journal/Contribution to newspaperReviewResearchpeer-review

Harvard

APA

CBE

MLA

Vancouver

Author

Bibtex

@article{d34f85580fac48cca798eff979311c6f,
title = "Consonance and dissonance perception: A critical review of the historical sources, multidisciplinary findings, and main hypotheses",
abstract = "Revealed more than two millennia ago by Pythagoras, consonance and dissonance (C/D) are foundational concepts in music theory, perception, and aesthetics. The search for the biological, acoustical, and cultural factors that affect C/D perception has resulted in descriptive accounts inspired by arithmetic, musicological, psychoacoustical or neurobiological frameworks without reaching a consensus. Here, we review the key historical sources and modern multidisciplinary findings on C/D and integrate them into three main hypotheses: the vocal similarity hypothesis (VSH), the psychocultural hypothesis (PH), and the sensorimotor hypothesis (SH). By illustrating the hypotheses-related findings, we highlight their major conceptual, methodological, and terminological shortcomings. Trying to provide a unitary framework for C/D understanding, we put together multidisciplinary research on human and animal vocalizations, which converges to suggest that auditory roughness is associated with distress/danger and, therefore, elicits defensive behavioral reactions and neural responses that indicate aversion. We therefore stress the primacy of vocality and roughness as key factors in the explanation of C/D phenomenon, and we explore the (neuro)biological underpinnings of the attraction-aversion mechanisms that are triggered by C/D stimuli. Based on the reviewed evidence, while the aversive nature of dissonance appears as solidly rooted in the multidisciplinary findings, the attractive nature of consonance remains a somewhat speculative claim that needs further investigation. Finally, we outline future directions for empirical research in C/D, especially regarding cross-modal and cross-cultural approaches.",
keywords = "Auditory roughness, Harmony, Musical intervals, Processing fluency, Vocal similarity hypothesis, Vocality",
author = "{Di Stefano}, Nicola and Peter Vuust and Elvira Brattico",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2022 Elsevier B.V.",
year = "2022",
month = dec,
doi = "10.1016/j.plrev.2022.10.004",
language = "English",
volume = "43",
pages = "273--304",
journal = "Physics of Life Reviews",
issn = "1571-0645",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Consonance and dissonance perception

T2 - A critical review of the historical sources, multidisciplinary findings, and main hypotheses

AU - Di Stefano, Nicola

AU - Vuust, Peter

AU - Brattico, Elvira

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2022 Elsevier B.V.

PY - 2022/12

Y1 - 2022/12

N2 - Revealed more than two millennia ago by Pythagoras, consonance and dissonance (C/D) are foundational concepts in music theory, perception, and aesthetics. The search for the biological, acoustical, and cultural factors that affect C/D perception has resulted in descriptive accounts inspired by arithmetic, musicological, psychoacoustical or neurobiological frameworks without reaching a consensus. Here, we review the key historical sources and modern multidisciplinary findings on C/D and integrate them into three main hypotheses: the vocal similarity hypothesis (VSH), the psychocultural hypothesis (PH), and the sensorimotor hypothesis (SH). By illustrating the hypotheses-related findings, we highlight their major conceptual, methodological, and terminological shortcomings. Trying to provide a unitary framework for C/D understanding, we put together multidisciplinary research on human and animal vocalizations, which converges to suggest that auditory roughness is associated with distress/danger and, therefore, elicits defensive behavioral reactions and neural responses that indicate aversion. We therefore stress the primacy of vocality and roughness as key factors in the explanation of C/D phenomenon, and we explore the (neuro)biological underpinnings of the attraction-aversion mechanisms that are triggered by C/D stimuli. Based on the reviewed evidence, while the aversive nature of dissonance appears as solidly rooted in the multidisciplinary findings, the attractive nature of consonance remains a somewhat speculative claim that needs further investigation. Finally, we outline future directions for empirical research in C/D, especially regarding cross-modal and cross-cultural approaches.

AB - Revealed more than two millennia ago by Pythagoras, consonance and dissonance (C/D) are foundational concepts in music theory, perception, and aesthetics. The search for the biological, acoustical, and cultural factors that affect C/D perception has resulted in descriptive accounts inspired by arithmetic, musicological, psychoacoustical or neurobiological frameworks without reaching a consensus. Here, we review the key historical sources and modern multidisciplinary findings on C/D and integrate them into three main hypotheses: the vocal similarity hypothesis (VSH), the psychocultural hypothesis (PH), and the sensorimotor hypothesis (SH). By illustrating the hypotheses-related findings, we highlight their major conceptual, methodological, and terminological shortcomings. Trying to provide a unitary framework for C/D understanding, we put together multidisciplinary research on human and animal vocalizations, which converges to suggest that auditory roughness is associated with distress/danger and, therefore, elicits defensive behavioral reactions and neural responses that indicate aversion. We therefore stress the primacy of vocality and roughness as key factors in the explanation of C/D phenomenon, and we explore the (neuro)biological underpinnings of the attraction-aversion mechanisms that are triggered by C/D stimuli. Based on the reviewed evidence, while the aversive nature of dissonance appears as solidly rooted in the multidisciplinary findings, the attractive nature of consonance remains a somewhat speculative claim that needs further investigation. Finally, we outline future directions for empirical research in C/D, especially regarding cross-modal and cross-cultural approaches.

KW - Auditory roughness

KW - Harmony

KW - Musical intervals

KW - Processing fluency

KW - Vocal similarity hypothesis

KW - Vocality

U2 - 10.1016/j.plrev.2022.10.004

DO - 10.1016/j.plrev.2022.10.004

M3 - Review

C2 - 36372030

AN - SCOPUS:85141484275

VL - 43

SP - 273

EP - 304

JO - Physics of Life Reviews

JF - Physics of Life Reviews

SN - 1571-0645

ER -