Considerations for study design in the DAHANCA 35 trial of protons versus photons for head and neck cancer

J. Friborg*, K. Jensen, J. G. Eriksen, E. Samsøe, C. Maare, M. Farhadi, P. Sibolt, M. Nielsen, M. Andersen, A. I.S. Holm, P. Skyt, B. Smulders, J. Johansen, Jens Overgaard, C. Grau, C. R. Hansen

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journal/Conference contribution in journal/Contribution to newspaperLetterpeer-review

Abstract

Proton radiotherapy offers a dosimetric advantage compared to photon therapy in sparing normal tissue, but the clinical evidence for toxicity reductions in the treatment of head and neck cancer is limited. The Danish Head and Neck Cancer Group (DAHANCA) has initiated the DAHANCA 35 randomised trial to clarify the value of proton therapy (NCT04607694). The DAHANCA 35 trial is performed in an enriched population of patients selected by an anticipated benefit of proton therapy to reduce the risk of late dysphagia or xerostomia based on normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) modelling. We present our considerations on the trial design and a test of the selection procedure conducted before initiating the randomised study.

Original languageEnglish
Article number109958
JournalRadiotherapy and Oncology
Volume190
ISSN0167-8140
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2024

Keywords

  • Head and neck cancer
  • Proton radiotherapy
  • Trial design

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Considerations for study design in the DAHANCA 35 trial of protons versus photons for head and neck cancer'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this