Conserving Southeast Asian trees requires mitigating both climate and land-use change

Sean E.H. Pang; J. W.Ferry Slik; Ryan A. Chisholm; Edward L. Webb

doi:10.1038/s41893-024-01417-4

Conserving Southeast Asian trees requires mitigating both climate and land-use change

Sean E.H. Pang^*, J. W.Ferry Slik, Ryan A. Chisholm, Edward L. Webb^*

^*Corresponding author for this work

Department of Biology - Center for Ecological Dynamics in a Novel Biosphere (ECONOVO)

Research output: Contribution to journal/Conference contribution in journal/Contribution to newspaper › Journal article › Research › peer-review

Abstract

The forests of Southeast Asia harbour high levels of species diversity, providing a plethora of ecosystem services. However, this biodiversity is threatened by both climate and land-use change, the impacts of which are poorly understood. We modelled 1,498 tree species distributions under four shared socioeconomic pathways (SSPs) with varying global change intensities, and classified species into 11 spatially associated groups. We found both global changes to cause severe losses in tree distributions. Only under SSP1–2.6, the sustainable pathway with low intensities in both global changes, were distribution losses mitigated. Unexpectedly, losses were overall greatest under intermediate climate change pathways SSP2–4.5 and SSP3–7.0 rather than under the most extreme pathway, SSP5–8.5. This was because, although climate-driven losses were greatest under SSP5–8.5, land-use-driven losses were much more extensive under SSP2–4.5 and SSP3–7.0 than under SSP5–8.5. Crucially, other than SSP1–2.6, each SSP led to worst-case scenarios for several species groups. Our findings highlight that to most effectively conserve Southeast Asian tree distributions, policymakers need to prioritize a sustainable pathway that mitigates both global changes.

Original language	English
Journal	Nature Sustainability
Volume	7
Issue	10
Pages (from-to)	1313-1323
Number of pages	11
ISSN	2398-9629
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-024-01417-4
Publication status	Published - Oct 2024

Access to Document

10.1038/s41893-024-01417-4

Cite this

@article{57bb63a1776b46268aed18b6ac4089e7,

title = "Conserving Southeast Asian trees requires mitigating both climate and land-use change",

abstract = "The forests of Southeast Asia harbour high levels of species diversity, providing a plethora of ecosystem services. However, this biodiversity is threatened by both climate and land-use change, the impacts of which are poorly understood. We modelled 1,498 tree species distributions under four shared socioeconomic pathways (SSPs) with varying global change intensities, and classified species into 11 spatially associated groups. We found both global changes to cause severe losses in tree distributions. Only under SSP1–2.6, the sustainable pathway with low intensities in both global changes, were distribution losses mitigated. Unexpectedly, losses were overall greatest under intermediate climate change pathways SSP2–4.5 and SSP3–7.0 rather than under the most extreme pathway, SSP5–8.5. This was because, although climate-driven losses were greatest under SSP5–8.5, land-use-driven losses were much more extensive under SSP2–4.5 and SSP3–7.0 than under SSP5–8.5. Crucially, other than SSP1–2.6, each SSP led to worst-case scenarios for several species groups. Our findings highlight that to most effectively conserve Southeast Asian tree distributions, policymakers need to prioritize a sustainable pathway that mitigates both global changes.",

author = "Pang, {Sean E.H.} and Slik, {J. W.Ferry} and Chisholm, {Ryan A.} and Webb, {Edward L.}",

note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Limited 2024.",

year = "2024",

month = oct,

doi = "10.1038/s41893-024-01417-4",

language = "English",

volume = "7",

pages = "1313--1323",

journal = "Nature Sustainability",

issn = "2398-9629",

publisher = "Springer Nature",

number = "10",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Conserving Southeast Asian trees requires mitigating both climate and land-use change

AU - Pang, Sean E.H.

AU - Slik, J. W.Ferry

AU - Chisholm, Ryan A.

AU - Webb, Edward L.

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Limited 2024.

PY - 2024/10

Y1 - 2024/10

N2 - The forests of Southeast Asia harbour high levels of species diversity, providing a plethora of ecosystem services. However, this biodiversity is threatened by both climate and land-use change, the impacts of which are poorly understood. We modelled 1,498 tree species distributions under four shared socioeconomic pathways (SSPs) with varying global change intensities, and classified species into 11 spatially associated groups. We found both global changes to cause severe losses in tree distributions. Only under SSP1–2.6, the sustainable pathway with low intensities in both global changes, were distribution losses mitigated. Unexpectedly, losses were overall greatest under intermediate climate change pathways SSP2–4.5 and SSP3–7.0 rather than under the most extreme pathway, SSP5–8.5. This was because, although climate-driven losses were greatest under SSP5–8.5, land-use-driven losses were much more extensive under SSP2–4.5 and SSP3–7.0 than under SSP5–8.5. Crucially, other than SSP1–2.6, each SSP led to worst-case scenarios for several species groups. Our findings highlight that to most effectively conserve Southeast Asian tree distributions, policymakers need to prioritize a sustainable pathway that mitigates both global changes.

AB - The forests of Southeast Asia harbour high levels of species diversity, providing a plethora of ecosystem services. However, this biodiversity is threatened by both climate and land-use change, the impacts of which are poorly understood. We modelled 1,498 tree species distributions under four shared socioeconomic pathways (SSPs) with varying global change intensities, and classified species into 11 spatially associated groups. We found both global changes to cause severe losses in tree distributions. Only under SSP1–2.6, the sustainable pathway with low intensities in both global changes, were distribution losses mitigated. Unexpectedly, losses were overall greatest under intermediate climate change pathways SSP2–4.5 and SSP3–7.0 rather than under the most extreme pathway, SSP5–8.5. This was because, although climate-driven losses were greatest under SSP5–8.5, land-use-driven losses were much more extensive under SSP2–4.5 and SSP3–7.0 than under SSP5–8.5. Crucially, other than SSP1–2.6, each SSP led to worst-case scenarios for several species groups. Our findings highlight that to most effectively conserve Southeast Asian tree distributions, policymakers need to prioritize a sustainable pathway that mitigates both global changes.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85202146933&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1038/s41893-024-01417-4

DO - 10.1038/s41893-024-01417-4

M3 - Journal article

AN - SCOPUS:85202146933

SN - 2398-9629

VL - 7

SP - 1313

EP - 1323

JO - Nature Sustainability

JF - Nature Sustainability

IS - 10

ER -

Conserving Southeast Asian trees requires mitigating both climate and land-use change

Abstract

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this