Connecting Governance and the Front Lines: How Work Pressure and Autonomy Matter for Coping in Different Performance Regimes

Nina van Loon, Mads Leth Jakobsen

Research output: Contribution to journal/Conference contribution in journal/Contribution to newspaperJournal articleResearchpeer-review

29 Citations (Scopus)
609 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

How frontline employees cope with perceived work pressure may be of direct influence on policy outcomes. This study contributes to the street-level bureaucracy literature in several ways. First, we study both passive client-oriented and active system-oriented coping. Second, we analyse how these coping behaviours relate to work pressure and work autonomy. Finally, this article analyses whether these relationships are conditioned by the performance regime. Using a unique set-up of hospital employees (n = 979) working in external and internal performance regimes, we find a higher level of system-oriented active coping than client-oriented passive coping. Moreover, we find that autonomy matters for system-oriented coping and work pressure for client-oriented coping, and that these relationships are context-dependent.

Original languageEnglish
JournalPublic Administration
Volume96
Issue3
Pages (from-to)435-451
Number of pages17
ISSN0033-3298
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sept 2018

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Connecting Governance and the Front Lines: How Work Pressure and Autonomy Matter for Coping in Different Performance Regimes'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this