Abstract

Amid ongoing global challenges such as health pandemics, climate change and environmental degradation, a nuanced discussion of the relational and contextual dynamics of trust has arguably never been more critical. Global challenges exemplify the urgency and complexity of issues where, despite scientific consensus, policy responses may be considered contentious, underscoring the roles of communicators, the public and media in shaping perceptions and actions. In such circumstances, there is an acute need to understand trust in science communication, as trust is a prerequisite for effective dialogue. Throughout this volume, trust emerges not merely as foundational to successful science communication but as a complex, dynamic construct shaped by diverse influences including the communicator’s ethos, transparency of communication processes, and public engagement. The discussion moves beyond simple dichotomies of trust and mistrust, presenting a spectrum that includes ambivalence and critical engagement. It encourages a rethinking of trust as something that must be continually earned and sustained through credible, ethical and responsive communication practices. In this volume, chapters explore topics, settings and forms of science communication where public trust is at play. The volume highlights the transformative potential of science communication in shaping public perception and trust. It underlines the importance of adapting communication strategies to diverse audiences and contexts, particularly during crises. Participatory approaches and third-order thinking in science communication are discussed as ways of enhancing trust by fostering inclusivity and dialogue.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationScience communication and trust
Number of pages17
PublisherPalgrave Macmillan
Publication date1 Jan 2025
Pages493-509
ISBN (Print)9789819612888
ISBN (Electronic)9789819612895
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2025

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Conclusion'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this