Aarhus University Seal

Dansk

You are here: » Comparison of long-term outcome of sacral nerve stimulati...

About Aarhus University

Comparison of long-term outcome of sacral nerve stimulation for constipation and faecal incontinence with focus on explantation rate, additional visits, and patient satisfaction

Research output: Contribution to journal/Conference contribution in journal/Contribution to newspaper › Journal article › Research › peer-review

Standard

Comparison of long-term outcome of sacral nerve stimulation for constipation and faecal incontinence with focus on explantation rate, additional visits, and patient satisfaction. / Hidaka, J.; Lundby, L.; Laurberg, S. et al.
In: Techniques in Coloproctology, Vol. 24, No. 11, 11.2020, p. 1189-1195.

Research output: Contribution to journal/Conference contribution in journal/Contribution to newspaper › Journal article › Research › peer-review

Harvard

Hidaka, J, Lundby, L, Laurberg, S & Duelund-Jakobsen, J 2020, 'Comparison of long-term outcome of sacral nerve stimulation for constipation and faecal incontinence with focus on explantation rate, additional visits, and patient satisfaction', Techniques in Coloproctology, vol. 24, no. 11, pp. 1189-1195. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-020-02328-0

APA

Hidaka, J., Lundby, L., Laurberg, S., & Duelund-Jakobsen, J. (2020). Comparison of long-term outcome of sacral nerve stimulation for constipation and faecal incontinence with focus on explantation rate, additional visits, and patient satisfaction. Techniques in Coloproctology, 24(11), 1189-1195. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-020-02328-0

CBE

Hidaka J, Lundby L, Laurberg S, Duelund-Jakobsen J. 2020. Comparison of long-term outcome of sacral nerve stimulation for constipation and faecal incontinence with focus on explantation rate, additional visits, and patient satisfaction. Techniques in Coloproctology. 24(11):1189-1195. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-020-02328-0

MLA

Hidaka, J. et al. "Comparison of long-term outcome of sacral nerve stimulation for constipation and faecal incontinence with focus on explantation rate, additional visits, and patient satisfaction". Techniques in Coloproctology. 2020, 24(11). 1189-1195. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-020-02328-0

Vancouver

Hidaka J, Lundby L, Laurberg S, Duelund-Jakobsen J. Comparison of long-term outcome of sacral nerve stimulation for constipation and faecal incontinence with focus on explantation rate, additional visits, and patient satisfaction. Techniques in Coloproctology. 2020 Nov;24(11):1189-1195. doi: 10.1007/s10151-020-02328-0

Author

Hidaka, J. ; Lundby, L. ; Laurberg, S. et al. / Comparison of long-term outcome of sacral nerve stimulation for constipation and faecal incontinence with focus on explantation rate, additional visits, and patient satisfaction. In: Techniques in Coloproctology. 2020 ; Vol. 24, No. 11. pp. 1189-1195.

Bibtex

@article{501df70a764e47ad9914b646d7b0a935,
title = "Comparison of long-term outcome of sacral nerve stimulation for constipation and faecal incontinence with focus on explantation rate, additional visits, and patient satisfaction",
abstract = "Background: The aim of the present study was to compare sacral nerve stimulation (SNS) for constipation (SNS-C) with SNS for idiopathic faecal incontinence (SNS-IFI) regarding explantation rate, additional visits, and improvement of patient satisfaction 5 years after implantation. Methods: From our prospective database (launched in 2009), we extracted all SNS-C patients 5 years post-implantation, and the SNS-IFI patients implanted just before and just after each SNS-C patient. We retrospectively evaluated the explantation rate, number of additional visits, and patient satisfaction using a visual analogue scale (VAS). We hypothesized that compared with those in the SNS-IFI group: (1) the explantation rate would be higher in SNS-C patients, (2) the number of additional visits would be higher in SNS-C patients, and (3) in patients with an active implant at 5 years, the improvement in VAS would be the same. Results: We included 40 SNS-C patients and 80 SNS-IFI patients. In the SNS-C group 7/40 (17.5%), patients were explanted, compared to 10/80 (12.5%) patients in the SNS-IFI group (p = 0.56). The mean number of additional visits in the SNS-C group was 3.5 (95% CI 2.8–4.1)) and 3.0 (95% CI 2.6–3.6)) in the SNS-IFI group (p = 0.38). Additional visits due to loss of efficacy were significantly higher in the SNS-C patients (p = 0.03). The reduction in VAS score (delta VAS) at 5 years was 37.1 (95% CI 20.9–53.3) in the SNS-C group, and 46.0 (95% CI 37.9–54.0) in the SNS-IFI group (p = 0.27). Conclusions: No significant difference was found regarding explantation rate, number of additional visits, or improvement of VAS at 5 years after SNS implantation between SNS-C patients and SNS-IFI patients.",
keywords = "Constipation, Faecal incontinence, Long-term outcome, Sacral nerve stimulation, SNS",
author = "J. Hidaka and L. Lundby and S. Laurberg and J. Duelund-Jakobsen",
year = "2020",
month = nov,
doi = "10.1007/s10151-020-02328-0",
language = "English",
volume = "24",
pages = "1189--1195",
journal = "Techniques in Coloproctology",
issn = "1123-6337",
publisher = "Springer - Verlag Italia Srl",
number = "11",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of long-term outcome of sacral nerve stimulation for constipation and faecal incontinence with focus on explantation rate, additional visits, and patient satisfaction

AU - Hidaka, J.

AU - Lundby, L.

AU - Laurberg, S.

AU - Duelund-Jakobsen, J.

PY - 2020/11

Y1 - 2020/11

N2 - Background: The aim of the present study was to compare sacral nerve stimulation (SNS) for constipation (SNS-C) with SNS for idiopathic faecal incontinence (SNS-IFI) regarding explantation rate, additional visits, and improvement of patient satisfaction 5 years after implantation. Methods: From our prospective database (launched in 2009), we extracted all SNS-C patients 5 years post-implantation, and the SNS-IFI patients implanted just before and just after each SNS-C patient. We retrospectively evaluated the explantation rate, number of additional visits, and patient satisfaction using a visual analogue scale (VAS). We hypothesized that compared with those in the SNS-IFI group: (1) the explantation rate would be higher in SNS-C patients, (2) the number of additional visits would be higher in SNS-C patients, and (3) in patients with an active implant at 5 years, the improvement in VAS would be the same. Results: We included 40 SNS-C patients and 80 SNS-IFI patients. In the SNS-C group 7/40 (17.5%), patients were explanted, compared to 10/80 (12.5%) patients in the SNS-IFI group (p = 0.56). The mean number of additional visits in the SNS-C group was 3.5 (95% CI 2.8–4.1)) and 3.0 (95% CI 2.6–3.6)) in the SNS-IFI group (p = 0.38). Additional visits due to loss of efficacy were significantly higher in the SNS-C patients (p = 0.03). The reduction in VAS score (delta VAS) at 5 years was 37.1 (95% CI 20.9–53.3) in the SNS-C group, and 46.0 (95% CI 37.9–54.0) in the SNS-IFI group (p = 0.27). Conclusions: No significant difference was found regarding explantation rate, number of additional visits, or improvement of VAS at 5 years after SNS implantation between SNS-C patients and SNS-IFI patients.

AB - Background: The aim of the present study was to compare sacral nerve stimulation (SNS) for constipation (SNS-C) with SNS for idiopathic faecal incontinence (SNS-IFI) regarding explantation rate, additional visits, and improvement of patient satisfaction 5 years after implantation. Methods: From our prospective database (launched in 2009), we extracted all SNS-C patients 5 years post-implantation, and the SNS-IFI patients implanted just before and just after each SNS-C patient. We retrospectively evaluated the explantation rate, number of additional visits, and patient satisfaction using a visual analogue scale (VAS). We hypothesized that compared with those in the SNS-IFI group: (1) the explantation rate would be higher in SNS-C patients, (2) the number of additional visits would be higher in SNS-C patients, and (3) in patients with an active implant at 5 years, the improvement in VAS would be the same. Results: We included 40 SNS-C patients and 80 SNS-IFI patients. In the SNS-C group 7/40 (17.5%), patients were explanted, compared to 10/80 (12.5%) patients in the SNS-IFI group (p = 0.56). The mean number of additional visits in the SNS-C group was 3.5 (95% CI 2.8–4.1)) and 3.0 (95% CI 2.6–3.6)) in the SNS-IFI group (p = 0.38). Additional visits due to loss of efficacy were significantly higher in the SNS-C patients (p = 0.03). The reduction in VAS score (delta VAS) at 5 years was 37.1 (95% CI 20.9–53.3) in the SNS-C group, and 46.0 (95% CI 37.9–54.0) in the SNS-IFI group (p = 0.27). Conclusions: No significant difference was found regarding explantation rate, number of additional visits, or improvement of VAS at 5 years after SNS implantation between SNS-C patients and SNS-IFI patients.

KW - Constipation

KW - Faecal incontinence

KW - Long-term outcome

KW - Sacral nerve stimulation

KW - SNS

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85089897874&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s10151-020-02328-0

DO - 10.1007/s10151-020-02328-0

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 32856184

AN - SCOPUS:85089897874

VL - 24

SP - 1189

EP - 1195

JO - Techniques in Coloproctology

JF - Techniques in Coloproctology

SN - 1123-6337

IS - 11

ER -