Comparing Rape Myth Acceptance Among Police Trainees and Medical Students: A Preliminary Danish Validation of the Updated Illinois Rape Myth Acceptance Scale

Marie Skov, Sarah van Mastrigt*, Andreas Videbæk Jensen

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journal/Conference contribution in journal/Contribution to newspaperJournal articleResearchpeer-review

6 Citations (Scopus)
98 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Identifying rape myths among criminal justice and medical professionals is central to preventing secondary victimization. We present the first preliminary Danish validation of McMahon and Farmer’s updated Illinois Rape Myth Acceptance scale using samples of police and medical trainees. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses result in a 14-item, four-factor measure that demonstrates acceptable model fit, satisfactory convergent and discriminant validity, and good internal consistency. Although reported rape myth acceptance is generally low in both samples, some subscale scores vary across professional groups, thereby identifying specific targets for intervention in different occupational contexts. Further tests of the scale are recommended.

Original languageEnglish
JournalViolence Against Women
Volume28
Issue11
Pages (from-to)2649-2676
Number of pages28
ISSN1077-8012
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sept 2022

Keywords

  • Denmark
  • factor analysis
  • police
  • rape myths
  • scale validation

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Comparing Rape Myth Acceptance Among Police Trainees and Medical Students: A Preliminary Danish Validation of the Updated Illinois Rape Myth Acceptance Scale'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this